PlanSwift Review 2026: Pricing, Pros, Cons, Alternatives
PlanSwift starts at $2,000. What each tier gates, the 9 limitations reviewers name, and 4 alternatives with published prices.
Page at a glance
PlanSwift is A twenty-year-old Windows desktop takeoff engine sold as one flat $2,000-per-seat-per-year licence, with trade content and a takeoff-to-accounting path both sold or built separately. It starts at $2,000 per licence, per year. One licence covers one user on one device at a time. The EULA's Single Seat clause lets the same person install on a desktop and a laptop "provided that there is no possibility that the Software will be used on more than one computer system simultaneously", and clause 4.2 counts unattended machines as users: "Non-human devices that utilize the Software without interaction are counted as users." The pricing page's quantity selector runs 1 to "10+", and the page's own JavaScript calls contactSalesSpecialPricing() the moment the quantity exceeds 9, so anything past nine seats leaves the published price and becomes a sales conversation. It fits A one-to-five-estimator office (roughly 5 to 40 field crew) bidding drawing-set work off flat PDFs from fixed Windows workstations, where the estimator prices in PlanSwift and hands an Excel file to whoever does the books. It's the wrong buy for A Mac-based or genuinely distributed estimating team, where two or more people work the same bid and someone regularly estimates away from the office, because There's no browser version, no Mac build, no shared cloud project, and ConstructConnect's own help centre withdraws support for remote desktop and server installs. So the workflow you'd be buying is one workstation, one job file, and files emailed between people. Alternatives that publish their prices are zzTakeoff from $49.99, TakeCost from $0, Bluebeam Revu from $260. One priced tiers, nine evidenced gaps and four alternatives, three of which publish a figure.
Whether PlanSwift is worth it
PlanSwift earns its money with A one-to-five-estimator office (roughly 5 to 40 field crew) bidding drawing-set work off flat PDFs from fixed Windows workstations, where the estimator prices in PlanSwift and hands an Excel file to whoever does the books. If that's you, it does the job. The sections below are the parts worth checking before you sign. But the fit is narrower than the marketing suggests, and the price isn't the whole cost.
It starts at $2,000. And pricing was verified on 7 August 2026, so you can check every figure below in a browser tab.
| Pricing model | Published tiers |
|---|---|
| Entry price | $2,000 |
| Users | One licence covers one user on one device at a time. The EULA's Single Seat clause lets th |
| Ownership | ConstructConnect, Inc. |
| Best fit | A one-to-five-estimator office (roughly 5 to 40 field crew) bidding drawing-set work off flat PDFs from fixed Windows workstations, where the estimator prices in PlanSwift and hands an Excel file to whoever does the books. |
| Accounting sync | A-Systems JobView (one-way), QuickBooks (none), Foundation Software (none), Microsoft Excel (one-way) |
What works
- Measure on the drawing, drag an assembly onto it, export the answer to Excel
- One flat annual price, transparent up to nine seats, opaque past that, and a contract that never mentions renewal
- Takeoff Boost is the headline feature and the contract classes it as revocable
- Using the AI grants a perpetual licence over your drawings for model training
- Painting has a trade page and a plugin; roofing has neither a trade page nor a nav entry
What does not
- Windows desktop only, and the vendor's own help centre disowns servers and remote desktop
- Two estimators can't work the same takeoff, so the job file gets emailed around
- $2,000 a seat with no smaller plan, and the tenth seat leaves the published price entirely
- Perpetual licences sold before the subscription switch have been retired, and at least one buyer reports a seat switched off mid-term
- All sales are final, and the contract that says so never explains how to cancel
PlanSwift is A twenty-year-old Windows desktop takeoff engine sold as one flat $2,000-per-seat-per-year licence, with trade content and a takeoff-to-accounting path both sold or built separately. It sells to Cross-trade and Painting and Roofing contractors, and the shape of the product follows from that: The loop PlanSwift is genuinely good at: point and click a length, area, count or volume off a flat PDF, drop a pre-built assembly of materials, waste and labour onto that measurement, and let the software price it. The vendor describes the exit as a spreadsheet rather than a ledger. But the friction sits at the seam: reviewers report the takeoff page and the estimate workbook not staying in sync, and describe the pricing side as materially less intuitive than the measuring side.
Ownership matters here more than it usually does. PlanSwift is owned by ConstructConnect, Inc., so weigh roadmap risk alongside the feature list. An independent product can be bought and folded into somebody else's plan two years after you sign.
The shops PlanSwift fits, and the ones it doesn't
It fits A one-to-five-estimator office (roughly 5 to 40 field crew) bidding drawing-set work off flat PDFs from fixed Windows workstations, where the estimator prices in PlanSwift and hands an Excel file to whoever does the books. That's the half most reviews print. Here's the other half, which is the one worth your time.
Don't buy it if you're A Mac-based or genuinely distributed estimating team, where two or more people work the same bid and someone regularly estimates away from the office. There's no browser version, no Mac build, no shared cloud project, and ConstructConnect's own help centre withdraws support for remote desktop and server installs. So the workflow you'd be buying is one workstation, one job file, and files emailed between people. Look at zzTakeoff instead.
Don't buy it if you're A one-truck or two-truck painting, roofing or remodelling contractor doing residential work who bids a handful of jobs a month. $2,000 a year plus $149 for the trade pack is a serious fixed cost against a small bid volume, and reviewers at that size say so directly. And a free-tier browser takeoff gets the same measurement off the same PDF at nil cost until the volume justifies more. Look at TakeCost instead.
Don't buy it if you're Any contractor who expects takeoff quantities or estimate totals to flow into QuickBooks, Sage or Xero without a person retyping them. PlanSwift publishes no direct accounting connector. QuickBooks appears on its partner directory only inside descriptions of third-party products, Sage and Xero appear nowhere on it, and the documented route out of the estimate is an Excel export. So the accounting handoff is a human with a spreadsheet. Look at STACK instead.
Don't buy it if you're A buyer who needs to know, before signing, exactly what renewal costs and how to stop it. The only contract PlanSwift publishes is an installation-time EULA that refuses refunds twice, reserves the right to change fees at any time, and contains no renewal or cancellation clause at all. Long-tenured owners in the review pool describe renewal terms changing under them. Look at Bluebeam Revu instead.
Pricing: what PlanSwift publishes and what it doesn't
So PlanSwift shows what it charges. Below is each tier, what it gates, and the costs that sit outside the subscription entirely.
| Tier | Price | Billing unit | What it unlocks |
|---|---|---|---|
| PlanSwift Professional | $2,000 | per licence, per year | Support included for the term, Software updates included for the term, 2 hours of training included, Everything's in one plan; there's no cheaper entry tier and no feature-gated upgrade |
One licence covers one user on one device at a time. The EULA's Single Seat clause lets the same person install on a desktop and a laptop "provided that there is no possibility that the Software will be used on more than one computer system simultaneously", and clause 4.2 counts unattended machines as users: "Non-human devices that utilize the Software without interaction are counted as users." The pricing page's quantity selector runs 1 to "10+", and the page's own JavaScript calls contactSalesSpecialPricing() the moment the quantity exceeds 9, so anything past nine seats leaves the published price and becomes a sales conversation.
There is a discount for paying annually up front: None. The only thing sold on the pricing page is a one-year term at $2,000; there is no monthly option to discount against. The page's JavaScript still carries a dormant `var subscriptionPrice = 99.00;` and a setSubscription() branch that would render the price with a " /mo" suffix, but setSelectionValues() hard-sets subscriptionQty = 0 and the monthly control is not rendered, so the $99/month path exists in the code and cannot be bought. And an annual prepay discount tells you an annual commitment exists, which is worth knowing before anyone mentions a term length out loud.
What isn't in the PlanSwift number you get quoted
Payment processing. None in the product. PlanSwift takes off quantities and prints or exports an estimate; it does not invoice or collect. The nearest thing on the vendor's own partner directory is DrawPay, a third-party construction factoring and payments company described as searching "for the best factoring bank" for the contractor, with its own separate commercial relationship.
Implementation and onboarding. Two hours of training are bundled: "This annual subscription includes support, software updates, and 2 hours of training." Anything past that is bought by telephone, not online. The personalized-training page says "Ready to make the most of your software purchase, call our sales team at 888.752.6794 Ext 1 to purchase your training hours!" and publishes no rate. The pricing page's own JavaScript carries `var trainingPrice = 300.00;` for an additional training unit, but the control that would let you buy it is not rendered on the page.
Minimum term. The purchasable term is one year. The EULA defines a Subscription License term as whatever was specified at purchase and adds a default: "If the term is not specified when You subscribe to the product, then the term is thirty (30) days." There is no minimum-commitment clause beyond the term you bought.
Getting out. No refunds under any circumstance. EULA 4.19: "In case of termination, All sales are final. Licensee will not be entitled to a refund of the amount paid for the license to use the Software, or any other amounts for any reason." Clause 3.4 repeats the same for Subscription Licenses. Clause 13 lets ConstructConnect terminate "immediately and without notice" for any breach.
Auto-renewal. The EULA is also the site's Terms of Use (the footer's "Terms of Use" link points at /eula/), and the words renew, auto-renew and cancel appear nowhere in it. So before signing, get in writing: does the $2,000 licence auto-renew on the anniversary; how many days' notice cancels it; which card gets debited; and what happens to your .psf job files on the day the licence lapses.
Modules sold separately. , , , , , , , . But the entry tier is not the price you'll pay. Add the modules your shop needs on day one and compare PlanSwift on that total.
Third-party services you will also pay for. , . These are not on PlanSwift's invoice, and they are still part of what this decision costs you every month.
Worth a detour here. PlanSwift sells an annual subscription but its contract describes a monthly one, and the contract that governs the money is an installation-time EULA that never mentions renewal or cancellation. There's no published document that tells a buyer what happens on the anniversary of their $2,000 payment. So that's the single question worth resolving in writing before signing, and it's the exact question two long-tenured reviewers say went badly for them.
The PlanSwift costs that land afterwards
The subscription is the part everyone quotes. These are the lines that land afterwards, and the ones we could not find are named as unpublished rather than left blank.
Sold separately. , , , , , , , . Price the configuration you'll really run, because an add-on you need on day one is part of the price.
Third-party services you'll also pay for. , . None of these are on PlanSwift's invoice, and all of them are part of what this decision costs every month.
"PlanSwift PlanSwift Professional is $2,000, per licence, per year."
PlanSwift pricing page (2026)
"One licence covers one user on one device at a time. The EULA's Single Seat clause lets the same person install on a desktop and a laptop "provided that there is no possibility that the Software will be used on more than one computer system simultaneously", and clause 4.2 counts unattended machines as users: "Non-human devices that utilize the Software without interaction are counted as users." The pricing page's quantity selector runs 1 to "10+", and the page's own JavaScript calls contactSalesSpecialPricing() the moment the quantity exceeds 9, so anything past nine seats leaves the published price and becomes a sales conversation."
PlanSwift pricing page (2026)
"The cost can be an obstacle for a growing company. I've talked to a lot of other Estimators who use this software and I feel departments always seem to be sharing several copies between multiple users as having a dedicated license for each user is cost prohibitive."
Capterra, Matt H. (8-23)
The five workflows you pay for
Feature totals are noise. So a shop in this category lives or dies on five things, and those are the five to grade, and each one below carries the evidence it's graded on.
Measure on the drawing, drag an assembly onto it, export the answer to Excel The loop PlanSwift is genuinely good at: point and click a length, area, count or volume off a flat PDF, drop a pre-built assembly of materials, waste and labour onto that measurement, and let the software price it. The vendor describes the exit as a spreadsheet rather than a ledger. But the friction sits at the seam: reviewers report the takeoff page and the estimate workbook not staying in sync, and describe the pricing side as materially less intuitive than the measuring side. On 2025-09, a construction, 11-50 employees describes it: "The takeoff page of Planswift is not linked to the workbook. Hence the quantities in workbook does not update itself."On 2026-05-01, an office manager, architecture & planning, 6-12 months on the platform, describes it: "PlanSwift has the best value for cost of any program we've tried previously. The workflow for our company has improved vastly. Also, the takeoff, estimate creation, and overall estimating is so easy to use that it's cut our work time in half."
One flat annual price, transparent up to nine seats, opaque past that, and a contract that never mentions renewal $2,000 per licence per year buys support, updates and two training hours. The published price holds to nine seats, then the page hands you to a salesperson. But what no published document explains is what happens twelve months later: no renewal clause, no cancellation procedure, no notice period, and an explicit right to change fees at any time. Two multi-year owners in the review pool describe the renewal conversation going badly. And an estimator, construction, 2+ years on the platform, writing on 2025-04-10, says the same thing: "Customer service. 100%. I paid thousands of dollars back in 2017 to buy perpetual licenses for the software. They told me that these are lifetime licenses. However, in 2025, they told me that they no longer support perpetual licenses and that we would have to pay an annual subscription fee to 'support' our license. We worked with our sales rep and worked to pay for the annual fee for one seat, but not the other. They told us that this is perfectly fine. A few weeks later, they deactivated our seat without telling us, saying that it wasn't allowed."And an owner, construction, 2+ years on the platform, writing on 2024-07-18, says the same thing: "Every time they get sold I have to re buy their product. I had gotten a call last month that I have to hand over a large sum of money or my plan swift 'may not work one day' if I don't hand them over more money, when it doesn't work it will cost me a lot more than what they are extorting out of me now. I purchased to program years ago about 13. I am sick of being fleeced."
Takeoff Boost is the headline feature and the contract classes it as revocable The 2026 homepage leads with Takeoff Boost, a cloud AI layer that auto-measures, auto-counts, auto-scales and auto-bookmarks a plan set. But the EULA gives it a legal name, Ancillary Services, and a legal status the marketing doesn't mention: discretionary, suspendable, potentially chargeable, and available only while you're paid up. And your plan sets leave the workstation to make it work.
Using the AI grants a perpetual licence over your drawings for model training EULA clause 6.6 authorises transmission of your construction plans to ConstructConnect's cloud when Takeoff Boost, Auto Scale, Auto Bookmark or Auto Count run. Clause 15 then takes a perpetual, worldwide, royalty-free licence over that content, explicitly including machine-learning model development, and assigns exclusive ownership of everything derived from it to ConstructConnect. Perpetual means the grant outlives the subscription: cancelling stops the software, not the licence.
Painting has a trade page and a plugin; roofing has neither a trade page nor a nav entry PlanSwift's trade navigation covers General Contractors, Concrete, Drywall, Electrical, Flooring, Framing, Decking, HVAC, Insulation, Landscape, Masonry, Painting and Plumbing. Roofing appears once, as a bullet in a "More Trades" list reading "Roofing / Siding", with no dedicated page; the only roofing-specific asset is a $149 Commercial Roofing Starter Pack in the plugin catalogue. So a roofer is buying a general measuring tool and one content pack, not a roofing product.
Which trades get value from PlanSwift
Fit differs by trade rather than by company size alone, and a blended paragraph hides that. Here is the split for the trades this one sells to.
Cross-trade. The workflow that decides it is measure on the drawing, drag an assembly onto it, export the answer to excel, and the shop profile that gets value is A one-to-five-estimator office (roughly 5 to 40 field crew) bidding drawing-set work off flat PDFs from fixed Windows workstations, where the estimator prices in PlanSwift and hands an Excel file to whoever does the books. doing residential and commercial work. Where it stops being a fit is A Mac-based or genuinely distributed estimating team, where two or more people work the same bid and someone regularly estimates away from the office.
Painting. The workflow that decides it is measure on the drawing, drag an assembly onto it, export the answer to excel, and the shop profile that gets value is A one-to-five-estimator office (roughly 5 to 40 field crew) bidding drawing-set work off flat PDFs from fixed Windows workstations, where the estimator prices in PlanSwift and hands an Excel file to whoever does the books. doing residential and commercial work. Where it stops being a fit is A Mac-based or genuinely distributed estimating team, where two or more people work the same bid and someone regularly estimates away from the office.
Roofing. The workflow that decides it is measure on the drawing, drag an assembly onto it, export the answer to excel, and the shop profile that gets value is A one-to-five-estimator office (roughly 5 to 40 field crew) bidding drawing-set work off flat PDFs from fixed Windows workstations, where the estimator prices in PlanSwift and hands an Excel file to whoever does the books. doing residential and commercial work. Where it stops being a fit is A Mac-based or genuinely distributed estimating team, where two or more people work the same bid and someone regularly estimates away from the office.
Where your data goes when it leaves PlanSwift
A-Systems JobView connects one way only, so edits made in your books do not come back, on every plan. QuickBooks connects, on every plan. Foundation Software connects, on every plan. Microsoft Excel connects one way only, so edits made in your books do not come back, on every plan. Your costs map through cost codes, so test yours against your own chart of accounts before you commit. A code your books don't recognise is how a labour charge quietly lands somewhere useless.
Past those, the road ends. Sage, Xero, Procore, Buildertrend, Any mobile app (iOS or Android) do not connect. So if your books run on an ERP rather than the platforms named above, weigh that before anything else.
Beyond accounting it connects to ConstructConnect (Project leads and plan sets from the parent company's bid-lead platform can be opened directly in PlanSwift; a reviewer describes the path as the main reason to use it.), Sigma Estimates (Spreadsheet-style estimating front end with a free PlanSwift integration download), Vision InfoSoft Electrical Bid Manager (Electrical items, assemblies and a material pricing database feeding PlanSwift takeoff), Red Rhino Electrical Estimating Software (Browser-based electrical estimating that consumes PlanSwift takeoff), UDA ConstructionSuite (Project management with its own QuickBooks link, connected to PlanSwift for quantities), Boise Cascade BC Framer (Engineered wood product design software sharing PlanSwift data), Google Maps (via SwiftMaps plugin) (Pulls aerial imagery into a takeoff, sold separately). A public API exists: No public API or SDK. The footer of every PlanSwift page still carries the markup `<!-- <li><a href="/developer/" title="Develop PlanSwift Plugins">Developer / API / SDK</a></li> -->`, commented out rather than deleted, and a request to https://www.planswift.com/developer/ returns HTTP 301 redirecting to the homepage. The plugin catalogue survives as a store; the developer front door does not. The partner directory counts 37 partner logos, but most entries date from a previous era of the product (one still advertises a 2009 release) and several are trade associations rather than integrations.
PlanSwift support, onboarding and the hours
Support is the line item nobody prices and everybody eventually needs. Onboarding for PlanSwift: Two hours of training are bundled: "This annual subscription includes support, software updates, and 2 hours of training." Anything past that is bought by telephone, not online. The personalized-training page says "Ready to make the most of your software purchase, call our sales team at 888.752.6794 Ext 1 to purchase your training hours!" and publishes no rate. The pricing page's own JavaScript carries `var trainingPrice = 300.00;` for an additional training unit, but the control that would let you buy it is not rendered on the page.
And a president, construction, 2+ years on the platform, writing on 2023-08-14, writes the same thing: "Customer service is the worst. Unsupportive agents. Lack of support. False promises to resolve issues. Running from responsibility. Transferring customer from agent to agent. Putting Customers on Hold for too Long. Agents Offer No Empathy."
Before you sign with PlanSwift: the exit
Nobody reads this section before they buy, and it's the one that costs money afterwards. Four terms decide what leaving looks like.
Minimum term. The purchasable term is one year. The EULA defines a Subscription License term as whatever was specified at purchase and adds a default: "If the term is not specified when You subscribe to the product, then the term is thirty (30) days." There is no minimum-commitment clause beyond the term you bought.
Auto-renewal. The EULA is also the site's Terms of Use (the footer's "Terms of Use" link points at /eula/), and the words renew, auto-renew and cancel appear nowhere in it. So before signing, get in writing: does the $2,000 licence auto-renew on the anniversary; how many days' notice cancels it; which card gets debited; and what happens to your .psf job files on the day the licence lapses.
Early termination. No refunds under any circumstance. EULA 4.19: "In case of termination, All sales are final. Licensee will not be entitled to a refund of the amount paid for the license to use the Software, or any other amounts for any reason." Clause 3.4 repeats the same for Subscription Licenses. Clause 13 lets ConstructConnect terminate "immediately and without notice" for any breach.
Payment processing. None in the product. PlanSwift takes off quantities and prints or exports an estimate; it does not invoice or collect. The nearest thing on the vendor's own partner directory is DrawPay, a third-party construction factoring and payments company described as searching "for the best factoring bank" for the contractor, with its own separate commercial relationship.
Small thing that turns out to matter. Turning on the AI feature the vendor leads with grants ConstructConnect a perpetual, irrevocable licence over your drawings for machine-learning training, and that grant survives cancellation. The marketing frames Takeoff Boost as an included upgrade. But the contract frames it as a revocable service you pay for with your clients' drawings, on a licence that outlasts your subscription. A contractor bidding proprietary or confidential work should read clause 15 before the first upload, not after.
"The price can be overwhelming at times - we like to keep up with the maintenance/updates and support which is an additional couple hundred dollars every year. Not to mention wanting to get a couple more computers with Planswift on each with their own license is impossible for us at this time, which is actually holding us back."
Capterra, Robert D. (9-05)
"The thing I liked the least about PlanSwift is that the system was too slow at times and over priced."
Software Advice, Toma P. (6-05)
"Customer service. 100%. I paid thousands of dollars back in 2017 to buy perpetual licenses for the software. They told me that these are lifetime licenses. However, in 2025, they told me that they no longer support perpetual licenses and that we would have to pay an annual subscription fee to 'support' our license. We worked with our sales rep and worked to pay for the annual fee for one seat, but not the other. They told us that this is perfectly fine. A few weeks later, they deactivated our seat without telling us, saying that it wasn't allowed."
Capterra, Israel B. (4-10)
What PlanSwift reviewers keep running into
So here's what breaks, sourced to the person who hit it.
Windows desktop only, and the vendor's own help centre disowns servers and remote desktop There's no browser version and no Mac build. ConstructConnect's system-requirements article tells Mac owners to buy Windows and a virtualisation product, and separately withdraws support for the two setups a distributed office would reach for first. So a Mac-led design-build shop pays for Windows plus Parallels on top of the $2,000, and an office that wanted one licence on a terminal server is told up front that any resulting problem is unsupported. Count the machines that will open a plan set. And if any of them are Macs, or if your estimator works from home two days a week, price the Windows licence and the virtualisation licence into the comparison before you compare $2,000 against a browser tool.
Two estimators can't work the same takeoff, so the job file gets emailed around PlanSwift keeps takeoff in a proprietary job file on one workstation. And there's no shared cloud project, so a second estimator either waits or works on a copy, and reconciling the copies is manual. Reviewers describe both halves of the problem: the passing-files-back-and-forth workflow, and takeoff items getting scrambled on the way back in. A representative, accounting, self-employed, Free trial on the platform, writing on 2026-03-23, says: "Lack of real-time collaboration. If two people need to work on the same takeoff, you have to pass files back and forth. You can't just log in from any laptop; you usually have to be at your specific workstation where the software is installed." Ask how many people touch one bid at your shop. So if the answer is more than one, ask the sales rep to demo two users editing the same takeoff at once, and watch what happens.
$2,000 a seat with no smaller plan, and the tenth seat leaves the published price entirely There's exactly one plan. A part-time estimator, a project manager who only wants to measure a roof twice a month, and a full-time chief estimator all cost the same $2,000 a year. And the pricing page's quantity picker stops at "10+", and the page's own script fires contactSalesSpecialPricing() as soon as the quantity exceeds nine, so a growing office loses price transparency at exactly the point it starts buying volume. Reviewers describe the predictable result: departments sharing copies rather than buying seats. Total the annual bill for every person who would need to open a plan, then compare it against a per-user monthly tool at the same headcount. At six seats PlanSwift is $12,000 a year before a single trade plugin.
Perpetual licences sold before the subscription switch have been retired, and at least one buyer reports a seat switched off mid-term PlanSwift was a perpetual-licence product for most of its life, changed hands from PlanSwift to Textura to Oracle to ConstructConnect, and is now a $2,000 annual subscription. Long-tenured buyers report being told their old licences no longer qualify for support and then losing access. This is the single loudest complaint pattern in the review pool and it's a pattern, not a one-off: two separate multi-year owners describe the same escalation from support fee to deactivation. But an estimator, construction, 2+ years on the platform, describes it it differently: "Customer service. 100%. I paid thousands of dollars back in 2017 to buy perpetual licenses for the software. They told me that these are lifetime licenses. However, in 2025, they told me that they no longer support perpetual licenses and that we would have to pay an annual subscription fee to 'support' our license. We worked with our sales rep and worked to pay for the annual fee for one seat, but not the other. They told us that this is perfectly fine. A few weeks later, they deactivated our seat without telling us, saying that it wasn't allowed." So if you already own a perpetual PlanSwift licence, get the current terms in writing before you pay anything: which licences stay live, for how long, and what the annual figure becomes at renewal.
All sales are final, and the contract that says so never explains how to cancel The EULA doubles as the site's Terms of Use, and it's written as an installation agreement rather than a subscription agreement. It refuses refunds twice, lets ConstructConnect terminate immediately and without notice, reserves the right to change fees at any time, and grants an audit right exercisable "at any time, upon reasonable notice" with the licensee reimbursing audit costs if anything is out of compliance. But what it never contains is a renewal clause, a cancellation procedure or a notice period. The words renew, auto-renew and cancel don't appear in the document. Get the renewal and cancellation mechanics on the order form, not the EULA. Because the published contract won't answer the question and can't be relied on to.
Trade content is a separate purchase, and the published plugin catalogue is deliberately incomplete The $2,000 buys the measuring engine. But the assemblies that make it a painting or roofing estimator are plugins: a Painting Starter Pack at $149, a Commercial Roofing Starter Pack at $149, ten trade packs at $149 each, a General Contractor pack at $349. The catalogue page lists 14 priced plugins and then tells you there are more it won't show you, routed through a phone number. Name every trade you bid and ask, in writing, which plugins that requires and what each costs. Add the total to the $2,000 before you compare anything.
PDF handling is raster-based, so the AI has pixels rather than geometry to work with PlanSwift reads flat PDFs. It doesn't consume vector CAD intelligence, which is why an estimator on a large civil job describes selecting lines and planes as unsupported. And it explains the recurring performance complaints on big plan sets, since everything is being rendered and measured as an image rather than queried as geometry. A senior engineering estimator, civil engineering, 10,001+ employees, More than 2 years on the platform, writing on 2025-07-08, reports it: "Unfortunately both methods are raster based so there is no intelligence for selecting lines, planes etc." Load your largest real plan set during the 14-day trial, not a sample. Time how long it takes to open, and try the pan tool after the fortieth sheet.
Takeoff and the estimate workbook are loosely coupled, so quantities can drift Changing a measurement on the drawing doesn't necessarily push through to the estimate workbook. And that's a data-integrity problem on a bid, because the number you quote and the number you measured can diverge without anything flagging it. Separately, an estimator describes the pricing side of the tool as materially harder than the measuring side. And a construction, 11-50 employees, writing on 2025-09, puts it the same thing: "The takeoff page of Planswift is not linked to the workbook. Hence the quantities in workbook does not update itself." During the trial, change a wall length after you've built the estimate and confirm the workbook total moved. And if it doesn't, decide now who's responsible for catching that.
No published API, and the developer page has been switched off The footer of every PlanSwift page still contains a Developer / API / SDK link, commented out in the HTML rather than removed, and /developer/ now 301-redirects to the homepage. So whatever plugin SDK existed, the public front door to it is closed. Practically, integration means Excel export or buying whatever a partner already built. If your plan involves piping takeoff quantities into anything other than a spreadsheet, get the integration confirmed as a shipping product before you buy, not as something a developer could build.
One more thing worth knowing. The flat $2,000 covers the measuring engine only; the trade content that makes it a painting or roofing estimator is a separate purchase from a catalogue that openly withholds most of itself. A painting contractor comparing $2,000 against a $49/month browser tool is comparing the wrong numbers. And the real first-year figure is $2,000 plus $149 plus whatever the unpublished plugins and extra training hours cost, and two of those three are only obtainable by telephone.
One more thing worth knowing. Takeoff lives in a proprietary job file on one machine, and the documented way to get anything out is a spreadsheet, so the exit cost is paid in retyping. Anything of value in a PlanSwift install is either a measurement locked in a .psf on a specific workstation or a spreadsheet somebody exported. Before a renewal you might not pay, export every live bid to Excel first, because clause 3.4 says a lapsed subscription can stop the software and clause 4.19 says you get nothing back.
One more thing worth knowing. The vendor can't agree with itself about how many customers it has, and the supporting cast of the website has quietly rotted around a product that's still selling. Judge PlanSwift on the takeoff engine, which reviewers still rate highly, and treat every number on the marketing site as unverified. And when a vendor's own homepage disagrees with itself by 17,000 customers, the install-base claim isn't evidence of anything.
One oddity, filed under things nobody mentions on a demo. The recurring one-star theme is the ownership carousel, not the software. Buyers who liked the product describe being re-monetised each time PlanSwift changed hands. When the praise and the fury sit in the same review, the risk is the commercial relationship, not the product. So price a PlanSwift purchase as a rolling annual expense with an unwritten renewal, never as an asset you own.
What people running PlanSwift tell you
Every quote below is transcribed from a published review, named to the platform that carries it and to the reviewer as that platform displays them. We read the corpus by complaint type rather than by star rating, which is how the disqualifying detail buried inside a five-star review gets found.
"Customer service. 100%. I paid thousands of dollars back in 2017 to buy perpetual licenses for the software. They told me that these are lifetime licenses. However, in 2025, they told me that they no longer support perpetual licenses and that we would have to pay an annual subscription fee to 'support' our license. We worked with our sales rep and worked to pay for the annual fee for one seat, but not the other. They told us that this is perfectly fine. A few weeks later, they deactivated our seat without telling us, saying that it wasn't allowed."
But an estimator, construction, 2+ years on the platform, puts it it differently on Capterra
"Every time they get sold I have to re buy their product. I had gotten a call last month that I have to hand over a large sum of money or my plan swift 'may not work one day' if I don't hand them over more money, when it doesn't work it will cost me a lot more than what they are extorting out of me now. I purchased to program years ago about 13. I am sick of being fleeced."
On 2024-07-18, an owner, construction, 2+ years on the platform, describes it on Capterra
"Customer service is the worst. Unsupportive agents. Lack of support. False promises to resolve issues. Running from responsibility. Transferring customer from agent to agent. Putting Customers on Hold for too Long. Agents Offer No Empathy."
On 2023-08-14, a president, construction, 2+ years on the platform, puts it on Capterra
"Lack of real-time collaboration. If two people need to work on the same takeoff, you have to pass files back and forth. You can't just log in from any laptop; you usually have to be at your specific workstation where the software is installed."
On 2026-03-23, a representative, accounting, self-employed, Free trial on the platform, says on Capterra
"The cost can be an obstacle for a growing company. I've talked to a lot of other Estimators who use this software and I feel departments always seem to be sharing several copies between multiple users as having a dedicated license for each user is cost prohibitive."
But a project director/chief estimator, construction, 2+ years on the platform, writes it differently on Capterra
"The price can be overwhelming at times - we like to keep up with the maintenance/updates and support which is an additional couple hundred dollars every year. Not to mention wanting to get a couple more computers with Planswift on each with their own license is impossible for us at this time, which is actually holding us back."
A project estimator, construction who reviewed it on 2018-09-05 puts it on Capterra
"Have to import pages to the software, has proprietary plan swift job files that make sharing a bit harder. Some glitches such as takeoff items getting jumbled when exporting/importing. Have to create folders for breakouts/separating takeoff by page (without plugins at least) which can make things like room schedules a bit tedious."
An application engineer, construction, Less than 6 months on the platform, writing on 2017-01-04, reports it on Capterra
"Sometimes it takes a while to upload large plans and sometimes the pan tool gets stuck, and you have to CTRL ALT DELETE for it to unstick."
A multifamily sales and scheduling, construction, 51-200 employees, 1-2 years on the platform, puts it it plainly on Capterra
"Unfortunately both methods are raster based so there is no intelligence for selecting lines, planes etc."
A senior engineering estimator, civil engineering, 10,001+ employees, More than 2 years on the platform, writing on 2025-07-08, reports it on Capterra
"I get hang when switching tabs also it does not remember the last drawing you were working so you have to open every time when you restart the software."
A freelancer, civil engineering, 1-2 years on the platform, describes it it plainly on Capterra
"PlanSwift has the best value for cost of any program we've tried previously. The workflow for our company has improved vastly. Also, the takeoff, estimate creation, and overall estimating is so easy to use that it's cut our work time in half."
An office manager, architecture & planning who reviewed it on 2026-05-01 writes on Capterra
"The takeoff page of Planswift is not linked to the workbook. Hence the quantities in workbook does not update itself."
A construction, 11-50 employees who reviewed it on 2025-09 writes on Software Advice
"Not really a dislike but be prepared to spend a decent amount of time implementing the software since it is not a plug and play type set up."
A construction, 2-10 employees, describes it it plainly on Software Advice
"The thing I liked the least about PlanSwift is that the system was too slow at times and over priced."
On 2026-05, a construction, 11-50 employees reports it on Software Advice
"I think there are alot better options on the market that have the same functions like estimating and takeoffs"
An utilities, 2-10 employees who reviewed it on 2026-06 writes on Software Advice
What else you should be pricing beside PlanSwift
And these are the products PlanSwift loses deals to. Some publish a price; that tells you how long each evaluation will take.
| Tool | Entry price | Billing unit | Users included | Published? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PlanSwift | $2,000 | per licence, per year | One licence covers one user on one device at a time. The EUL | Yes |
| zzTakeoff | $49.99 | per user, per month (or $549.89 per user, per year) | 1 | Yes |
| TakeCost | $0 | per account (Core plan, free forever; Accelerated is $49 per month or $490 per year) | 1 | Yes |
| Bluebeam Revu | $260 | per user, billed annually (Basics; Core $330, Complete $440, Max $590) | 1 | Yes |
| STACK | Quote only | per user (not published) | No |
zzTakeoff. Real-time multi-user collaboration on one takeoff, browser-based access from any machine, and a $19.99 annotation-only seat for people who need to read plans rather than measure them. Named by PlanSwift itself in its How We Compare footer. But A far younger product with a shallower assembly and trade-content library than PlanSwift's twenty-year catalogue; no equivalent to the $149 trade starter packs.
TakeCost. Cost of entry. Full takeoff tools for area, length and count at nil cost with one new takeoff file a month, browser-based with no install, and Mac compatible. For a small painting or roofing outfit bidding a few jobs a month, this is the honest comparison against $2,000. But One new takeoff file per month on the free plan; a much thinner assembly library; and no equivalent to PlanSwift's depth of custom parts, formulas and reporting.
Bluebeam Revu. Price transparency and tier choice: four published plans against PlanSwift's one, starting at roughly an eighth of PlanSwift's annual seat cost. Stronger PDF markup and drawing-comparison workflow, and Studio gives genuine cloud collaboration. Also named in PlanSwift's own How We Compare footer. But Measurement and markup rather than estimating: Quantity Link pushes quantities to Excel but there's no assembly-and-cost engine equivalent to PlanSwift's, and perimeter and volume measurement is gated above the $260 Basics tier.
STACK. Cloud-native by design, so multiple estimators work the same project from any machine including Macs, and there's a free version of Takeoff & Estimate to start on. And it publishes a real integration network including ERP and accounting connectors, which PlanSwift doesn't. But It won't tell you what it costs: the pricing page carries no dollar figure at all and routes every buyer to a demo. But PlanSwift at least publishes $2,000 before you speak to anyone.
"Every time they get sold I have to re buy their product. I had gotten a call last month that I have to hand over a large sum of money or my plan swift 'may not work one day' if I don't hand them over more money, when it doesn't work it will cost me a lot more than what they are extorting out of me now. I purchased to program years ago about 13. I am sick of being fleeced."
Capterra, Joseph N. (7-18)
"Customer service is the worst. Unsupportive agents. Lack of support. False promises to resolve issues. Running from responsibility. Transferring customer from agent to agent. Putting Customers on Hold for too Long. Agents Offer No Empathy."
Capterra, Douglas B. (8-14)
Who should not buy PlanSwift
Don't buy PlanSwift if you're A Mac-based or genuinely distributed estimating team, where two or more people work the same bid and someone regularly estimates away from the office. There's no browser version, no Mac build, no shared cloud project, and ConstructConnect's own help centre withdraws support for remote desktop and server installs. So the workflow you'd be buying is one workstation, one job file, and files emailed between people. Look at zzTakeoff instead.
Don't buy PlanSwift if you're A one-truck or two-truck painting, roofing or remodelling contractor doing residential work who bids a handful of jobs a month. $2,000 a year plus $149 for the trade pack is a serious fixed cost against a small bid volume, and reviewers at that size say so directly. And a free-tier browser takeoff gets the same measurement off the same PDF at nil cost until the volume justifies more. Look at TakeCost instead.
Don't buy PlanSwift if you're Any contractor who expects takeoff quantities or estimate totals to flow into QuickBooks, Sage or Xero without a person retyping them. PlanSwift publishes no direct accounting connector. QuickBooks appears on its partner directory only inside descriptions of third-party products, Sage and Xero appear nowhere on it, and the documented route out of the estimate is an Excel export. So the accounting handoff is a human with a spreadsheet. Look at STACK instead.
Don't buy PlanSwift if you're A buyer who needs to know, before signing, exactly what renewal costs and how to stop it. The only contract PlanSwift publishes is an installation-time EULA that refuses refunds twice, reserves the right to change fees at any time, and contains no renewal or cancellation clause at all. Long-tenured owners in the review pool describe renewal terms changing under them. Look at Bluebeam Revu instead.
The verdict, by shop size
Solo estimator or 1-2 truck residential painter, roofer or remodeller
No. $2,000 a year plus $149 for the trade pack is roughly a truck payment against a bid volume that doesn't need it, and the money buys a Windows-only single-workstation tool with no cancellation clause in its published contract. Reviewers at this size say it plainly: too slow at times and over priced, and there are alot better options on the market. And a free browser takeoff measures the same PDF at nil cost. So come back when a second estimator is on payroll. This band runs 1 to 6 on the crew, doing residential work, and that's the profile the recommendation is written for.
Small commercial or specialty office with 1-3 estimators, one bid at a time, fixed Windows workstations
Only under conditions, and they are worth being honest about. This is the band PlanSwift was built for and still serves: the measure-drag-assembly-export loop is fast, the trade packs are real, and the flat $2,000 is predictable up to nine seats. Three conditions. First, everyone's on Windows and nobody needs to bid from a laptop at home. Second, only one person touches a bid at a time, because there's no shared project and the file gets emailed otherwise. And third, you get renewal price and cancellation notice in writing on the order form, because the published EULA contains neither. This band runs 5 to 40 on the crew, doing commercial and residential work, and that's the profile the recommendation is written for.
Growing contractor with 4+ estimators or a distributed preconstruction team
No. Two structural walls hit at once. The bill is $8,000 a year at four seats and leaves published pricing entirely at ten, and the product can't let two of those estimators work the same takeoff, which is exactly what a team this size needs. And reviewers describe the workaround already in progress: departments sharing copies because a dedicated licence per user is cost prohibitive. So that's a licence-audit exposure as well as a workflow one, given the EULA's audit-at-any-time clause and its rule that unattended machines count as users. This band runs 40 to 200 on the crew, doing commercial and residential work, and that's the profile the recommendation is written for.
Existing PlanSwift perpetual-licence owner being asked to move to the subscription
Only under conditions, and they are worth being honest about. The takeoff engine you already know is worth something, and switching costs are real because your job files are in a proprietary format. But this is the loudest complaint pattern in the review pool: multi-year owners describing perpetual licences declared unsupported, a large sum demanded, and in one case a seat deactivated mid-arrangement without notice. So before you pay, get the licence status, the renewal figure and the cancellation notice period in writing, and export your live bids to Excel first so that a lapse can't strand them. This band runs undefined or more on the crew, doing commercial and residential work, and that's the profile the recommendation is written for.
Mac-based design-build or architecture-adjacent estimator
No. ConstructConnect's own help centre tells you to buy Windows and Parallels or dual-boot before you can install it. So that's two extra licences and a reboot habit on top of $2,000 a year, to run a raster-only desktop tool, when browser-based competitors run natively in Safari for a fraction of the cost. This band runs undefined or more on the crew, doing residential and commercial work, and that's the profile the recommendation is written for.
Where we come into the PlanSwift question
We should declare an interest, or rather the absence of one. Fervor takes nothing from PlanSwift or any of its rivals. What we've got is data on the demand side.
PlanSwift charges $2,000 a year per seat for a Windows desktop tool whose entire job is turning a drawing into a number an estimator can trust, and its buyers care enough about that accuracy to write reviews when the takeoff sheet and the estimate workbook drift apart. But the same contractors then run websites where the quote form is the least-checked thing they own: across the 380 contractor sites Fervor inspected, 95.8% carried a serious WCAG violation and 61.3% a critical one, and the most common critical failures are unlabelled form inputs and controls a screen reader can't name. So a PlanSwift user who'd never ship a bid with an unlinked workbook is shipping a quote form that silently drops the homeowner who needed a keyboard to fill it in, and no plugin fixes that one.
We ran 380 contractor websites through the Contractor CRO Index. 82.8% of them loaded slowly enough that a quote form went unseen. But check the method before you take the number, which is why it is published. Method and sample sizes live in the Contractor CRO Index.
"82.8% of the 380 contractor websites inspected loaded slowly enough that a quote form went unseen."
Fervor Studio Contractor CRO Index (2026)
Buy the platform if it fits. But spend ten minutes on your own site first, on a phone, on mobile data, the way a homeowner would. The numbers are all public.
See where your site is losing the jobs PlanSwift would have managed
And it takes about three days. We use your site the way a homeowner would, then hand you the specific leaks.
Get a Site InspectionWhat we read on PlanSwift, and what we couldn't get to
And here's what we can and can't stand behind on PlanSwift. So here's the basis. We read 19 vendor pages for PlanSwift on 7 August 2026, and we went through the reviews looking for complaints rather than for averages. Prices were checked the same day. Nothing here is carried forward from an older sweep.
So: 15 quotes on this page, eleven from Capterra and four from Software Advice.
And G2 — PlanSwift's own homepage cites a "4.3 G2 Rating" but G2 blocks automated retrieval, so the figure is a vendor claim only and couldn't be verified at source, TrustRadius — PlanSwift's homepage cites a "9.9 TrustRadius" score in the same badge row; TrustRadius blocks retrieval and the figure couldn't be verified, Trustpilot — no reachable PlanSwift profile, Reddit — fully blocked and Direct curl to capterra.com, softwareadvice.com and getapp.com returns HTTP 403 behind Cloudflare; review content was retrieved through WebFetch instead, which means the review quotes couldn't be re-verified against raw HTML the way the vendor figures were refused automated retrieval for PlanSwift. Forum and social threads are the ones people most want quoted, and they are exactly the ones we cannot verify, so none of them are here.
What that leaves untested: apple App Store and Google Play — PlanSwift is a Windows desktop application with no mobile client, so there's no store listing to check. And everything above is 19 vendor pages and a review corpus, which is documentary rather than hands-on.
What PlanSwift users say
Customer service. 100%. I paid thousands of dollars back in 2017 to buy perpetual licenses for the software. They told me that these are lifetime licenses. However, in 2025, they told me that they no longer support perpetual licenses and that we would have to pay an annual subscription fee to 'support' our license. We worked with our sales rep and worked to pay for the annual fee for one seat, but not the other. They told us that this is perfectly fine. A few weeks later, they deactivated our seat without telling us, saying that it wasn't allowed.
Every time they get sold I have to re buy their product. I had gotten a call last month that I have to hand over a large sum of money or my plan swift 'may not work one day' if I don't hand them over more money, when it doesn't work it will cost me a lot more than what they are extorting out of me now. I purchased to program years ago about 13. I am sick of being fleeced.
Customer service is the worst. Unsupportive agents. Lack of support. False promises to resolve issues. Running from responsibility. Transferring customer from agent to agent. Putting Customers on Hold for too Long. Agents Offer No Empathy.
Lack of real-time collaboration. If two people need to work on the same takeoff, you have to pass files back and forth. You can't just log in from any laptop; you usually have to be at your specific workstation where the software is installed.
The cost can be an obstacle for a growing company. I've talked to a lot of other Estimators who use this software and I feel departments always seem to be sharing several copies between multiple users as having a dedicated license for each user is cost prohibitive.
The price can be overwhelming at times - we like to keep up with the maintenance/updates and support which is an additional couple hundred dollars every year. Not to mention wanting to get a couple more computers with Planswift on each with their own license is impossible for us at this time, which is actually holding us back.
Have to import pages to the software, has proprietary plan swift job files that make sharing a bit harder. Some glitches such as takeoff items getting jumbled when exporting/importing. Have to create folders for breakouts/separating takeoff by page (without plugins at least) which can make things like room schedules a bit tedious.
Sometimes it takes a while to upload large plans and sometimes the pan tool gets stuck, and you have to CTRL ALT DELETE for it to unstick.
Unfortunately both methods are raster based so there is no intelligence for selecting lines, planes etc.
I get hang when switching tabs also it does not remember the last drawing you were working so you have to open every time when you restart the software.
PlanSwift has the best value for cost of any program we've tried previously. The workflow for our company has improved vastly. Also, the takeoff, estimate creation, and overall estimating is so easy to use that it's cut our work time in half.
The takeoff page of Planswift is not linked to the workbook. Hence the quantities in workbook does not update itself.
Not really a dislike but be prepared to spend a decent amount of time implementing the software since it is not a plug and play type set up.
The thing I liked the least about PlanSwift is that the system was too slow at times and over priced.
I think there are alot better options on the market that have the same functions like estimating and takeoffs
Frequently asked questions
How much does PlanSwift cost?
$2,000 per licence per year, published openly on planswift.com/pricing. There's one plan, PlanSwift Professional, and it includes support, software updates and two hours of training. But there's no cheaper tier and no monthly option. The published price holds up to nine licences; the quantity selector's last option is "10+" and the page's own script hands you to a salesperson beyond nine. Trade content is extra: the plugin catalogue runs $99 to $349, with ten trade starter packs at $149 each.
Does PlanSwift run on a Mac?
No. ConstructConnect's system-requirements article says it directly: "PlanSwift cannot be installed directly on a MAC, you must use Bootcamp (dual-boot) or install PlanSwift in a virtual machine such as Parallels running a supported version of Windows." The recommended spec is Windows 11 Pro or Enterprise 64-bit with 16GB of RAM. And the same article warns that PlanSwift "has known issues with being installed to a Server or Remote Desktop environment" and that ConstructConnect can't support those installs, which rules out the usual workaround for a remote estimator.
Can two estimators work on the same takeoff at once?
No. PlanSwift stores takeoff in a proprietary job file on one workstation, with no shared cloud project. A Capterra reviewer describes it exactly: "If two people need to work on the same takeoff, you have to pass files back and forth. You can't just log in from any laptop; you usually have to be at your specific workstation where the software is installed." And another reports takeoff items getting jumbled on export and re-import, which is the cost of the file-passing workaround.
Does PlanSwift integrate with QuickBooks?
Not directly. PlanSwift publishes no QuickBooks connector. QuickBooks appears on its partner directory only inside descriptions of third-party products (UDA ConstructionSuite and Smart Contractor), where the QuickBooks link belongs to those products, not to PlanSwift. Sage and Xero appear nowhere on the directory. The documented way out of a PlanSwift estimate is a spreadsheet: "PlanSwift instantly and accurately calculates your costs and margins then print or export to excel." Someone keys it into the ledger from there.
What happened to PlanSwift's perpetual licences?
They were retired, and the transition is the loudest complaint pattern in the review pool. PlanSwift passed from its founders to Textura, then to Oracle, then to ConstructConnect, and is now sold only as an annual subscription. One estimator wrote in April 2025: "I paid thousands of dollars back in 2017 to buy perpetual licenses ... They told me that these are lifetime licenses. However, in 2025, they told me that they no longer support perpetual licenses." He goes on to describe a seat being deactivated without notice. A separate 13-year owner wrote in July 2024: "Every time they get sold I have to re buy their product." So if you hold an old licence, get the current terms in writing before paying anything.
Who owns the plans I upload to Takeoff Boost, PlanSwift's AI?
You keep your plans, but you also grant ConstructConnect a perpetual licence over them. EULA clause 6.6 authorises transmission of your drawings to ConstructConnect's cloud when Takeoff Boost, Auto Scale, Auto Bookmark or Auto Count run. Clause 15 then takes "a fully-paid, non-exclusive, perpetual, worldwide, royalty-free license to copy, use, analyze, aggregate and modify the Licensee Content" for, among other things, "developing, improving, and enhancing its products, software, and services including its machine learning models", and makes ConstructConnect "the exclusive owner of all intellectual property rights in any products, software, and services developed using Licensee Content." And perpetual means cancelling the subscription doesn't end the grant.
Can I cancel PlanSwift and get a refund?
Refunds are refused outright, twice. EULA 4.19: "In case of termination, All sales are final. Licensee will not be entitled to a refund of the amount paid for the license to use the Software, or any other amounts for any reason." Clause 3.4 repeats it for subscription licences. As for cancelling, the EULA doubles as the site's Terms of Use and contains no cancellation procedure, no notice period and no renewal clause; the words renew, auto-renew and cancel don't appear in it. So get those mechanics on the order form before you sign, because the published contract won't answer them.
Is PlanSwift good for roofing or painting takeoff?
Painting is a supported trade with its own page and a $149 Painting Starter Pack of "Over 300 templates with takeoff tools, parts and assemblies". But roofing is thinner: it has no dedicated trade page (both /roofing/ and /estimating-software/roofing/ return 404) and appears only as a "Roofing / Siding" bullet in a More Trades list. The one roofing asset is a $149 Commercial Roofing Starter Pack in the plugin store. So either way you're buying a general measuring engine plus a content pack, and both packs are on top of the $2,000.
How many people use PlanSwift?
PlanSwift's own homepage gives two different answers. The hero reads "Trusted by 60,000+ Users"; the trial modal further down the same page reads "Trusted by 43,000+ construction pros". Both strings sit in the same HTML file. The independent number is the Gartner review pool: 402 reviews at 4.3 out of 5, a figure that appears identically on Capterra, Software Advice and GetApp because all three are Gartner properties reading one pool, not three sources agreeing.
Does PlanSwift have an API?
Not a public one. The footer on every PlanSwift page still contains the markup for a Developer / API / SDK link, commented out rather than removed, and https://www.planswift.com/developer/ now returns a 301 redirect to the homepage. The plugin store survives, the developer front door doesn't. The partner directory lists 37 logos, but the entries are visibly stale (one still advertises a 2009 product release) and several are trade associations rather than integrations. So plan on Excel as your integration.
Freshness
How we keep this page current
Three dates govern this review, and they carry different meanings. The initial source sweep is dated August 7, 2026; when only part of the evidence set is recaptured later, that later date is stated beside the refreshed claim. We last revised the page on August 7, 2026. And the user reviews we quote were posted over roughly the last 24 months, so their individual dates remain part of the evidence instead of being overwritten by a later pricing update.
We revise the page when PlanSwift changes a published price or a contract term, when a rating we cite moves by more than a few tenths, or when the vendor ships something big enough to change the verdict. We never bump the date just to look fresh, because Google treats that as manipulation and so do we. If a figure here reads as stale by the time you land on it, treat it as a floor and check the vendor's own page. We linked it at every number for exactly that reason.
Sourcing
How this review was researched
Every figure on this page traces to a captured source linked inline where it appears. The initial sweep is dated August 7, 2026; any later, partial recapture is dated at the claim rather than relabelling the whole evidence set. Ratings come from Capterra, GetApp, Software Advice and the Apple App Store. Note that Capterra, GetApp and Software Advice share one Gartner Digital Markets review pool, so an identical score across all three is a single sample rather than three corroborating ones, and this page treats it that way. G2, TrustRadius and Trustpilot block automated access, so where their numbers appear they are labelled as reported rather than verified. No claim here is sourced from Reddit or from a contractor Facebook group, because neither could be retrieved and quoting them would mean inventing attribution. Pricing marked as reported comes from third-party roundups, never from Fervor. Fervor's own findings come from the Contractor CRO Index 2026.
About
About Fervor Studio
Fervor Studio is a conversion rate optimization (CRO) and web design studio for home services contractors across North America, based in Cochrane, Alberta. Fervor does not sell field service management software and is not an alternative to PlanSwift. It publishes the Contractor CRO Index, a public benchmark measuring contractor website conversion potential using reproducible, open-source methods such as axe-core and Google Lighthouse. Fervor Studio is operated by Fervor Group Inc.
Aug 2, 2026 Tech Stack
Best Plumbing Software in 2026: Ten Ranked Across Four Classes
A plumbing company’s work runs through four classes of software that do not substitute for each other, and it only buys two of them. Ten products, each with a published price or an explicit statement that the vendor publishes none.
Read Article
Jul 31, 2026 Tech Stack
NiceJob vs Birdeye 2026: Pricing, Contracts and Review Gating
One of these vendors puts its price on the page and its cancellation terms in writing. The other puts a form in front of both, and the complaint record is where its contract length shows up.
Read Article
Jul 31, 2026 Tech Stack
Podium vs Birdeye 2026: Pricing, Contracts and Review Gating
Only one of these two will tell you what it costs before a sales call, and even that number carries a carve-out aimed squarely at trade contractors.
Read Article
Jul 31, 2026 Tech Stack
Best Electrical Contractor Software 2026: 11 Ranked and Priced
An electrical contracting business makes two software purchases that do not substitute for each other, and every roundup answering this query covers only one of them. Eleven platforms, with a published price or an explicit statement that the vendor publishes none.
Read Article
Jul 31, 2026 Tech Stack
Best HVAC Software in 2026: Eleven Ranked Across Three Classes
An HVAC contracting business buys across three classes of software that do not substitute for each other, and every roundup answering this query covers only one of them. Eleven products, each with a published price or an explicit statement that the vendor publishes none.
Read Article
Jul 30, 2026 Tech Stack
AccuLynx Pricing 2026: The Real Cost of a Quote-Gated Plan
One published figure, two blank plan cards, and a contract that says things the pricing page does not. A line-by-line breakdown of what AccuLynx really bills.
Read Article
Jul 30, 2026 Tech Stack
Houzz Pro Canada Review 2026: Pricing and Alternatives
Houzz Pro serves different pricing renderings. What Canadian buyers see, how GST/HST and payments work, what Custom gates, and what the annual contract commits you to.
Read Article
Jul 30, 2026 Tech Stack
JobNimbus Pricing in 2026: What the Quote Does Not Cover
JobNimbus prints no figure on any of its four plans. So the only rate you can read before a sales call is the payments meter, and it is the biggest line on the bill.
Read Article
Jul 30, 2026 Tech Stack
JobNimbus Review 2026: Pricing, Pros, Cons and Alternatives
JobNimbus rates 4.6 on Capterra and orders material straight from ABC Supply and SRS. But it publishes no price, and its supplement route carries a note.
Read Article
Jul 30, 2026 Tech Stack
BuildOps Review 2026: Pricing, Contract Terms and Alternatives
BuildOps runs commercial service and projects on one platform, and publishes no pricing at all. The billing unit, the 30-day data-export window, and who it suits.
Read Article
Jul 30, 2026 Tech Stack
FieldPulse Review 2026: Pricing, Pros, Cons and Alternatives
FieldPulse rates 4.6 on Capterra and is the platform contractors name when they leave a bigger system. But it publishes no price, and the contract runs a year.
Read Article
Jul 30, 2026 Tech Stack
Service Fusion Review 2026: Pricing, Contract and Alternatives
Service Fusion bills flat per company with unlimited users, which is the best structural deal in field service software. The published plans, the contract behind the no-contract line, and the app score every other review gets wrong.
Read Article
Jul 30, 2026 Tech Stack
Knowify Review 2026: Pricing, Job Costing and Alternatives
Knowify rates 4.5 on Capterra and its weakest sub-score is features. What the $99 Core plan withholds, which way the QuickBooks sync really runs, and who should not buy it.
Read Article
Jul 29, 2026 Tech Stack
AccuLynx Review 2026: Pricing, Tier Gating, Alternatives
AccuLynx rates 4.6 across 846 reviews and now publishes an entry price. What that price omits, which tier holds the insurance workflow, and who should skip it.
Read Article
Jul 29, 2026 Tech Stack
Unitel Voice Review 2026: Pricing, Features and Alternatives
Unitel Voice rates 4.6 on Capterra and gives a one-truck shop a business number for $9.99 a month. The published plans, the cost per call, and what it won't do.
Read Article
Jul 29, 2026 Tech Stack
NiceJob vs Podium 2026: Pricing, Contracts and Review Gating
Both vendors print a price, at very different scale and in different currencies. The gap that matters is what Podium will not print: the billing unit, and whether a trade shop gets the number on the page.
Read Article
Jul 28, 2026 Tech Stack
CompanyCam Review 2026: Pricing, Pros, Cons and Alternatives
Every page ranking for CompanyCam still quotes a per-user price the vendor no longer charges. Here are the real plans, the seat math, and who should skip it.
Read Article
Jul 28, 2026 Tech Stack
NiceJob Review 2026: Pricing, Pros, Cons and Alternatives
NiceJob rates 4.9 on Capterra and refuses to gate negative reviews. Real plan pricing, the active-customer threshold nobody publishes, and who should skip it.
Read Article
Jul 27, 2026 Tech Stack
Buildertrend Review 2026: Pricing, Limits and Alternatives
Buildertrend rates 4.5 across 2,486 Capterra reviews and quotes against your revenue rather than your seat count. The workflows, the export problem, the alternatives.
Read Article
Jul 27, 2026 Tech Stack
CallRail Review 2026: Pricing, Pros, Cons and Alternatives
CallRail rates 4.5 on Capterra, and its tracking numbers port out free. But the two usage rates that decide your real bill are the two it does not print.
Read Article
Jul 27, 2026 Tech Stack
Roofr Review 2026: Pricing, Pros, Cons and Alternatives
Roofr rates 4.6 on Capterra and sells $13 measurement reports against a market charging triple. But it will not import a report from anywhere else.
Read Article
Jul 25, 2026 Tech Stack
Housecall Pro Review 2026: Pricing, Pros, Cons, Alternatives
Housecall Pro has the shortest learning curve in the category and the widest review spread. Real pricing, the Instapay math, and the migration trap to plan around.
Read Article
Jul 24, 2026 Tech Stack
Jobber Review 2026: Pricing, Pros, Cons and Alternatives
Jobber rates 4.6 on Capterra with the best mobile app in the category. Real plan pricing, the feature gating that changes your entry price, and who it suits.
Read Article
Jul 23, 2026 Tech Stack
ServiceTitan Review 2026: Pricing, Pros, Cons, Alternatives
ServiceTitan rates 4.3 on Capterra but its weakest score is value for money. Real reported pricing, the 12-month contract, the exit fees, and who it actually suits.
Read Article
Jun 3, 2026 Tech Stack
HVAC Online Scheduling: The 43% Losing After-Hours Bookings
HVAC leads every trade on online booking at just 56.7%, which still leaves 43% of sites forcing an after-hours customer to wait for a business-hours phone call.
Read Article