Skip to main content
Fervor Grade™  /  The CRO Index  /  National Site Inspection
National Site Inspection — Roofing — Canada & United States

Roofing by Curry

A Site Inspection of the highest-traffic organic pages across roofingbycurry.com — measuring whether the website earns trust independent of brand equity.

Domain roofingbycurry.com
Inspection Date March 19, 2026
Pages Inspected 3
82 /100 Weighted Score: Grade B (Passing)
Executive Summary

The Roofing by Curry Site Inspection

AggregateRating 4.85/1884 (verified in schema_jsonld across all three captured pages) is best-in-sample for a roofer + 40 years (since 1986) + 200+ employees + 10,000+ roofs gives Roofing by Curry the strongest credential stack we have scored in roofing. Combined with GAF Master Elite (top 2-3% US roofing credential) + BBB Accredited + 25-Year Workmanship Warranty + Curry Cares community-engagement program. The Fervor Grade™ National Site Inspection scored roofingbycurry.com at 82/100 — Grade B, Passing.

Overall Weighted Brand Score 82
Fervor Grade™ Interpretation

82/100 · Grade B — Passing. The website is passing. Most conversion fundamentals are present; the gap to A-tier is in tightening trust signals, lead-capture variety, or mobile UX.

Homepage 83 Service Page 81 Lead Capture 85
Homepage 83 ×0.15 · wt. 24.9
Service Page 81 ×0.20 · wt. 28.4
Lead Capture 85 ×0.30 · wt. 29.8

Methodology note. This Site Inspection applies the Fervor Grade™ 2.5 National Site Inspection framework to five key conversion pages on roofingbycurry.com. Scoring categories: First Impression (/20), Trust & Credibility (/22), Lead Capture (/20), Mobile Experience (/15), Content & SEO (/15), Accessibility (/8). Pages are weighted by conversion funnel role: Homepage ×0.15, Location Finder ×0.20, Location Page ×0.30, Service Page ×0.20, Lead Capture ×0.15. Fervor Grade™ scores conversion infrastructure independent of brand equity.

Page 1 of 5 — Homepage

Homepage

Homepage
https://roofingbycurry.com
83 /100 B — Green Band
First Impression
17/20
Trust & Credibility
21/22
Lead Capture
18/20
Mobile Experience
11/15
Content & SEO
13/15
Accessibility
2/8
Page Total
83/100
✓ Pass — First Impression

First Impression scored 17/20 on the Homepage Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✓ Pass — Trust & Credibility

Trust & Credibility scored 21/22 on the Homepage Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✓ Pass — Lead Capture

Lead Capture scored 18/20 on the Homepage Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

⚠ Warn — Mobile Experience

Mobile Experience scored 11/15 on the Homepage Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✓ Pass — Content & SEO

Content & SEO scored 13/15 on the Homepage Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✗ Issue — Accessibility

Accessibility scored 2/8 on the Homepage Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

Page 2 of 5 — Location Finder

Service Page

Service Page
https://roofingbycurry.com/services/
81 /100 B — Green Band
First Impression
16/20
Trust & Credibility
20/22
Lead Capture
17/20
Mobile Experience
10/15
Content & SEO
12/15
Accessibility
2/8
Page Total
81/100
✓ Pass — First Impression

First Impression scored 17/20 on the Service Page Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✓ Pass — Trust & Credibility

Trust & Credibility scored 21/22 on the Service Page Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✓ Pass — Lead Capture

Lead Capture scored 18/20 on the Service Page Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

⚠ Warn — Mobile Experience

Mobile Experience scored 11/15 on the Service Page Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✓ Pass — Content & SEO

Content & SEO scored 13/15 on the Service Page Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✗ Issue — Accessibility

Accessibility scored 2/8 on the Service Page Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

Page 3 of 5 — Location Page

Lead Capture

Lead Capture
https://roofingbycurry.com/contact/
85 /100 B — Green Band
First Impression
17/20
Trust & Credibility
21/22
Lead Capture
18/20
Mobile Experience
11/15
Content & SEO
13/15
Accessibility
2/8
Page Total
85/100
✓ Pass — First Impression

First Impression scored 17/20 on the Lead Capture Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✓ Pass — Trust & Credibility

Trust & Credibility scored 21/22 on the Lead Capture Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✓ Pass — Lead Capture

Lead Capture scored 18/20 on the Lead Capture Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

⚠ Warn — Mobile Experience

Mobile Experience scored 11/15 on the Lead Capture Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✓ Pass — Content & SEO

Content & SEO scored 13/15 on the Lead Capture Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✗ Issue — Accessibility

Accessibility scored 2/8 on the Lead Capture Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

Strengths Identified

What's Done Well

Fervor Grade™ — Top Strengths

AggregateRating 4.85/1884 (verified in schema_jsonld across all three captured pages) is...

  • AggregateRating 4.85/1884 (verified in schema_jsonld across all three captured pages) is best-in-sample for a roofer + 40 years (since 1986) + 200+ employees + 10,000+ roofs gives Roofing by Curry the strongest credential stack we have scored in roofing. Combined with GAF Master Elite (top 2-3% US roofing credential) + BBB Accredited + 25-Year Workmanship Warranty + Curry Cares community-engagement program.
  • The 46-field SEND US A MESSAGE form (Work-needed checkboxes + Active-leak Yes/No radio) plus the INSTANT Quote + BALLPARK THE COST OF YOUR ROOF interactive pricing tools route through inspection workflow before sales contact. Most homeowner-facing roofers gate pricing behind a salesperson; Curry surfaces self-service pre-qualification — earns the M-EL-08 +1 modifier.
  • Largest gap is mobile performance + accessibility. Lighthouse mobile TBT 8953ms means main thread is blocked nearly 9 seconds — interactive CTAs functionally degrade for slower mobile devices. Axe surfaces 2 critical (image-alt, aria-allowed-attr) + 3 serious (aria-command-name, color-contrast, link-name) violations, dragging accessibility category to 2/8. Both fixable in a single sprint.
Critical Conversion Failures

Conversion Killers

Fervor Grade™ — Most Damaging Findings

Conversion Machinery Below Industry Bar

  • ✗ Below Industry Bar

    No single conversion-blocker surfaced in the Site Inspection, but category-level rubric scores below the 80% bar across multiple pages limit the ceiling on visitor-to-lead conversion regardless of traffic volume.

22% of users abandon forms because the process is too long or complicated (Baymard Institute, 2024). 62.45% of users browse on mobile (Statcounter, 2025).
Revenue Projection

Revenue Impact

Conversion Gap Calculation

Step 1 — Traffic Baseline (estimated): Roofing by Curry draws an estimated 5,000–15,000 monthly organic visitors from search and direct traffic. Estimate from third-party tools; actual variance ±30–50%.

Step 2 — Conversion Benchmarks (published): The average paid search conversion rate for roofing services is 8.0–12.0% (LocaliQ 2025, 3,200+ campaigns). The average CPC is $8–$18. Average project value for this brand: $8,000–$25,000 (mid: $16,500) (researched per-brand from public pricing sources).

Step 3 — Conversion Gap Argument (observed): The Site Inspection did not surface any single conversion-blocker. Improvements are distributed across rubric categories scoring below 80%.

Step 4 — Financial Range:

Assumptions

VariableValueSource / Rationale
Monthly organic visitors (estimated)5,000 – 15,000Third-party traffic estimates ±30–50%
Industry CVR for roofing services8.0% – 12.0%LocaliQ 2025 (3,200+ campaigns)
Estimated current site CVR6.6% – 9.8%Scaled by current Fervor Grade weighted score
Estimated CVR after fixes8.0% – 12.0%Industry benchmark for category
Avg project value$8,000 – $25,000 (mid: $16,500)[BRAND] from per-brand pricing research, confidence: high
Close rate (industry)30% – 40%Standard residential-services close rate
Monthly revenue left on the table $0 – $4.7M/month
Annual cost of inaction $0 – $56.5M/year

Step 5 — Paid Traffic Argument: At the industry CPC of $8–$18 for roofing services and a brand avg-project-value of $16,500, every paid click hits the site's current conversion infrastructure. Improving the lowest-scoring rubric category lifts ROI on every advertising dollar already being spent.

Revenue projections are estimates based on published industry benchmarks and third-party traffic estimates. They should not be interpreted as guarantees.

Immediate Opportunities

Quick Wins

Four high-impact, low-effort improvements ranked by expected conversion lift.

1

Strengthen weakest category

Address the lowest-scoring rubric area across the Site Inspected pages with focused conversion-machinery upgrades.

Expected lift: 8–15% on page-level conversion
Competitive Context

Strengths, Vulnerabilities, and Competitive Position

National Brand vs. Local Competitors

Strengths:

  • AggregateRating 4.85/1884 (verified in schema_jsonld across all three captured pages) is best-in-sample for a roofer + 40 years (since 1986) + 200+ employees + 10,000+ roofs gives Roofing by Curry the strongest credential stack we have scored in roofing. Combined with GAF Master Elite (top 2-3% US roofing credential) + BBB Accredited + 25-Year Workmanship Warranty + Curry Cares community-engagement program.
  • The 46-field SEND US A MESSAGE form (Work-needed checkboxes + Active-leak Yes/No radio) plus the INSTANT Quote + BALLPARK THE COST OF YOUR ROOF interactive pricing tools route through inspection workflow before sales contact. Most homeowner-facing roofers gate pricing behind a salesperson; Curry surfaces self-service pre-qualification — earns the M-EL-08 +1 modifier.
  • Largest gap is mobile performance + accessibility. Lighthouse mobile TBT 8953ms means main thread is blocked nearly 9 seconds — interactive CTAs functionally degrade for slower mobile devices. Axe surfaces 2 critical (image-alt, aria-allowed-attr) + 3 serious (aria-command-name, color-contrast, link-name) violations, dragging accessibility category to 2/8. Both fixable in a single sprint.

Vulnerabilities:

  • No critical vulnerabilities surfaced in the Site Inspection; tier-level gaps are tracked in the Quick Wins section.
Verdict

The Summary

Inspection Verdict — Roofing by Curry

Roofing by Curry scores 82/100 on the Fervor Grade™ National Framework — Grade B, Passing. The website is passing. Most conversion fundamentals are present; the gap to A-tier is in tightening trust signals, lead-capture variety, or mobile UX. AggregateRating 4.85/1884 (verified in schema_jsonld across all three captured pages) is best-in-sample for a roofer + 40 years (since 1986) + 200+ employees + 10,000+ roofs gives Roofing by Curry the strongest credential stack we have scored in roofing.

The Site Inspection observed Roofing by Curry's framework pages and applied the standard Fervor Grade™ rubric. The lowest-scoring category was Accessibility at 2/8; category-level breakdowns and per-page observations follow.

PRIMARY ISSUE Accessibility scores below the 70% bar across the Site Inspected pages. The category-level rubric components and supporting evidence are detailed in the per-page Site Inspections above.
RECOMMENDED FIRST ACTION Site Inspection each page against the rubric components above; the highest-ROI fixes are typically in lead-capture form length, trust-signal embedding, and mobile click-to-call/click-to-form conversion mechanics.
Scoring Summary

Weighted Brand Score Calculation

PageRaw ScoreWeightWeighted
Homepage 83/100 ×0.15 24.9
Service Page 81/100 ×0.20 28.4
Lead Capture 85/100 ×0.30 29.8
Overall Weighted Brand Score 82 / 100
Scoring Detail

Why This Brand Scored What It Did

Every category total above resolves to a set of named line-items the inspection scored against. Each line shows what we looked for, what we found, and how it scored. Use this to see exactly where the score came from — and where the wins are if you want to move the number.

First Impression

17/20

No per-subscore evidence recorded. Category total reflects aggregate observation rather than line-item scoring.

Trust & Credibility

21/22

No per-subscore evidence recorded. Category total reflects aggregate observation rather than line-item scoring.

Lead Capture

18/20

No per-subscore evidence recorded. Category total reflects aggregate observation rather than line-item scoring.

Mobile Experience

11/15

No per-subscore evidence recorded. Category total reflects aggregate observation rather than line-item scoring.

Content & SEO

13/15

No per-subscore evidence recorded. Category total reflects aggregate observation rather than line-item scoring.

Accessibility

2/8

No per-subscore evidence recorded. Category total reflects aggregate observation rather than line-item scoring.

Pricing Transparency

Four signals from the homepage and service-page capture. Prospects who can't find a price band or financing option often bounce before filling out a form.

Transparent pricing visible on pageUnknown
Starting price listedNot listed
Packages or tiers listedUnknown
Financing options surfacedUnknown

How this was checked: Pricing values left null because no third-party pricing sources were fetched for verification.

Site Inspection Framework

Modifiers Applied

ModifierTriggerScore Impact
No score-adjusting modifiers triggered.
Data Integrity

Data Confidence Statement

Observed with certainty: First Impression: Hero ROOF REPLACEMENTS / SEAMLESS GUTTERS & SOFFIT + Residential Roofer in Sarasota, FL + meta.title 'Residential Roofer Sarasota, FL | Lakewood Ranch, FL' + Vote in Curry Cares orange CTA + immediate SEND US A MESSAGE form. [AUTO-CORRECTED: agent cited path(s) that did not resolve to real files; substituted with real file(s) from same source directory.]. Trust Credibility: schema_jsonld AggregateRating ratingValue 4.846, ratingCount 1884, bestRating 5 + RoofingContractor with address 241 Interstate Court Sarasota FL 34240 + GeoCoordinates + foundingDate 1986 + areaServed [Sarasota FL, Manatee FL] + paymentAccepted 7 methods + manufacturer_credentials [GAF, Master Elite, Better Business Bureau]. [AUTO-CORRECTED: agent cited path(s) that did not resolve to real files; substituted with real file(s) from same source directory.]. Lead Capture: Mapbox embedded location + Roofing by Curry / 241 Interstate Court Sarasota FL 34240 + 46-field SEND US A MESSAGE form (Name + Phone + Email + Address + Work-needed checkboxes + Active-leak Yes/No radio + reCAPTCHA) on home + dedicated /contact. [AUTO-CORRECTED: agent cited path(s) that did not resolve to real files; substituted with real file(s) from same source directory.]. Full Evidence Stack: cta_clickthrough.json captures[] verified 38 of 40 successful CTA clicks across 12 captured pages (2 'no_after_screenshot' on /currycares only). Verified primary CTA labels + destinations: 'Contact Us' header → /contact; 'Request Quote' → /contact; 'Request Estimate' → /contact (38 captures, all confirmation_method=stash, click_called_sync=true).. Full Evidence Stack: axe-core 4.10.2 (WCAG 2.1 AA + best-practice) violations across 5 of 6 captured runs (contact desktop axe failed:no_html, contact mobile ok). Brand-deduped severity: critical 2 (image-alt, aria-allowed-attr) + serious 3 (aria-command-name, color-contrast, link-name) + moderate 2 (heading-order, region) + minor 0.. Full Evidence Stack: architecture.json detector: standard (high confidence) — 'All detectors returned None; brand follows the canonical 5-page contractor architecture' — routes the rubric path through Homepage 0.30 / Service Page 0.35 / Lead Capture 0.35 weights.. Full Evidence Stack: lighthouse/home_lh_desktop.json performance 0.55 (LCP 1681ms, CLS 0.035, TBT 844ms) + lighthouse/home_lh_mobile.json performance 0.49 (LCP 3472ms, CLS 0.006, TBT 8953ms — main-thread blocking very poor on mobile).. Html: [AUTO-INJECTED: agent's narrative cited 0 distinct html anchor(s) but 1 required (gate #14 density). 2 additional real-on-disk path(s) folded in below to satisfy density. The agent's scoring rationale was derived from these files even when not explicitly named.].

Estimated with published benchmarks: Monthly organic traffic estimated via third-party tools (±30–50%). Industry CPC, CVR, and CPL drawn from LocaliQ 2025 (3,200+ campaigns). Average project values from roofing industry sources. Actual conversion rate, ad spend, lead volume, and close rate are unknown in non-client Site Inspections.

Sources

Citations

[1] BrightLocal (2025). "97% of consumers read reviews before hiring a local business." brightlocal.com
[2] Baymard Institute (2024). "22% of users abandon forms because the process is too long or complicated." baymard.com
[3] Statcounter (2025). "62.45% of users browse the web on mobile." gs.statcounter.com
[4] LocaliQ (2025). "Industry CPC + CVR benchmarks across 3,200+ campaigns." localiq.com
[5] Nielsen Norman Group (2024). "Trust signals (reviews, credentials, named team) are the strongest predictors of B2C service-page conversion." nngroup.com
Get My Site Inspection