Skip to main content
Fervor Grade™  /  The CRO Index  /  National Site Inspection
National Site Inspection — Roofing — Canada & United States

Findlay Roofing

A Site Inspection of the highest-traffic organic pages across findlayroofing.com — measuring whether the website earns trust independent of brand equity.

Domain findlayroofing.com
Inspection Date March 19, 2026
Pages Inspected 5
77 /100 Weighted Score: Grade C (Conditional)
Executive Summary

The Findlay Roofing Site Inspection

Re-score 2026-05-15 from FRESH evidence drops findlay-roofing from prior B/A 81-82 to C 77. Two material drags surfaced in the recapture: (1) reviews_ratings drops to 3/5 because dom_facts now confirms ZERO numeric ratings, ZERO review_widgets, ZERO AggregateRating schema across all 5 captured pages — prior pass over-credited 'testimonials' that the captured DOM does not corroborate; (2) project_portfolio drops to 1/4 because the 8x 'Photo' alt-text-only tiles carry no project metadata, captions, or before/after structure. The Fervor Grade™ National Site Inspection scored findlayroofing.com at 77/100 — Grade C, Conditional.

Capture Context

This Site Inspection reflects what automated visitors see. The inspection's captured screenshots show the brand's response to bot-class traffic — Googlebot, SEO crawlers, uptime monitors, accessibility tools, and headless browsers all hit the same surface. A site that blocks these visitors has a real discoverability + conversion problem regardless of what a human on a consumer browser sees. The score below is the correct read of that bot-class view.

  • chat_widget_detected: false in dom_facts conflicts with chat widget visible in every screenshot (sticky bottom-bar Text/Call/Email/Chat on mobile, 'How can we help?' panel on desktop). Detector miss documented; visual evidence used for scoring. No score adjustment.
Overall Weighted Brand Score 77
Fervor Grade™ Interpretation

77/100 · Grade C — Conditional. The website is slow. Visitors convert despite the site, not because of it. Multiple categories are below the 70% bar.

Homepage 80 Service Page 78 Lead Capture 78 Location Finder 76 Location Page 78
Homepage 80 ×0.15 · wt. 16.0
Service Page 78 ×0.20 · wt. 15.6
Lead Capture 78 ×0.30 · wt. 15.6
Location Finder 76 ×0.20 · wt. 15.2
Location Page 78 ×0.15 · wt. 15.6

Methodology note. This Site Inspection applies the Fervor Grade™ 2.5 National Site Inspection framework to five key conversion pages on findlayroofing.com. Scoring categories: First Impression (/20), Trust & Credibility (/22), Lead Capture (/20), Mobile Experience (/15), Content & SEO (/15), Accessibility (/8). Pages are weighted by conversion funnel role: Homepage ×0.15, Location Finder ×0.20, Location Page ×0.30, Service Page ×0.20, Lead Capture ×0.15. Fervor Grade™ scores conversion infrastructure independent of brand equity.

Page 1 of 5 — Homepage

Homepage

Homepage
https://findlayroofing.com
80 /100 B — Green Band
First Impression
18/20
Trust & Credibility
17/22
Lead Capture
18/20
Mobile Experience
11/15
Content & SEO
13/15
Accessibility
0/8
Page Total
80/100
✓ Pass — First Impression

First Impression scored 18/20 on the Homepage Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✓ Pass — Trust & Credibility

Trust & Credibility scored 17/22 on the Homepage Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✓ Pass — Lead Capture

Lead Capture scored 18/20 on the Homepage Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

⚠ Warn — Mobile Experience

Mobile Experience scored 11/15 on the Homepage Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✓ Pass — Content & SEO

Content & SEO scored 13/15 on the Homepage Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✗ Issue — Accessibility

Accessibility scored 0/8 on the Homepage Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

Page 2 of 5 — Location Finder

Service Page

Service Page
https://findlayroofing.com/services/
78 /100 C — Green Band
First Impression
18/20
Trust & Credibility
17/22
Lead Capture
18/20
Mobile Experience
11/15
Content & SEO
13/15
Accessibility
0/8
Page Total
78/100
✓ Pass — First Impression

First Impression scored 18/20 on the Service Page Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✓ Pass — Trust & Credibility

Trust & Credibility scored 17/22 on the Service Page Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✓ Pass — Lead Capture

Lead Capture scored 18/20 on the Service Page Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

⚠ Warn — Mobile Experience

Mobile Experience scored 11/15 on the Service Page Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✓ Pass — Content & SEO

Content & SEO scored 13/15 on the Service Page Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✗ Issue — Accessibility

Accessibility scored 0/8 on the Service Page Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

Page 3 of 5 — Location Page

Lead Capture

Lead Capture
https://findlayroofing.com/contact/
78 /100 C — Green Band
First Impression
18/20
Trust & Credibility
17/22
Lead Capture
18/20
Mobile Experience
11/15
Content & SEO
13/15
Accessibility
0/8
Page Total
78/100
✓ Pass — First Impression

First Impression scored 18/20 on the Lead Capture Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✓ Pass — Trust & Credibility

Trust & Credibility scored 17/22 on the Lead Capture Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✓ Pass — Lead Capture

Lead Capture scored 18/20 on the Lead Capture Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

⚠ Warn — Mobile Experience

Mobile Experience scored 11/15 on the Lead Capture Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✓ Pass — Content & SEO

Content & SEO scored 13/15 on the Lead Capture Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✗ Issue — Accessibility

Accessibility scored 0/8 on the Lead Capture Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

Page 4 of 5 — Primary Service Page

Location Finder

Location Finder
https://findlayroofing.com/locations/
76 /100 C — Green Band
First Impression
17/20
Trust & Credibility
16/22
Lead Capture
17/20
Mobile Experience
10/15
Content & SEO
12/15
Accessibility
0/8
Page Total
76/100
✓ Pass — First Impression

First Impression scored 18/20 on the Location Finder Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✓ Pass — Trust & Credibility

Trust & Credibility scored 17/22 on the Location Finder Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✓ Pass — Lead Capture

Lead Capture scored 18/20 on the Location Finder Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

⚠ Warn — Mobile Experience

Mobile Experience scored 11/15 on the Location Finder Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✓ Pass — Content & SEO

Content & SEO scored 13/15 on the Location Finder Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✗ Issue — Accessibility

Accessibility scored 0/8 on the Location Finder Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

Page 5 of 5 — Lead Capture

Location Page

Location Page
https://findlayroofing.com/locations//
78 /100 C — Green Band
First Impression
18/20
Trust & Credibility
17/22
Lead Capture
18/20
Mobile Experience
11/15
Content & SEO
13/15
Accessibility
0/8
Page Total
78/100
✓ Pass — First Impression

First Impression scored 18/20 on the Location Page Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✓ Pass — Trust & Credibility

Trust & Credibility scored 17/22 on the Location Page Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✓ Pass — Lead Capture

Lead Capture scored 18/20 on the Location Page Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

⚠ Warn — Mobile Experience

Mobile Experience scored 11/15 on the Location Page Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✓ Pass — Content & SEO

Content & SEO scored 13/15 on the Location Page Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

✗ Issue — Accessibility

Accessibility scored 0/8 on the Location Page Site Inspection. See the rubric components in the Scoring Summary section for category-level breakdowns.

Strengths Identified

What's Done Well

Fervor Grade™ — Top Strengths

Re-score 2026-05-15 from FRESH evidence drops findlay-roofing from prior B/A 81-82 to C 77.

  • Re-score 2026-05-15 from FRESH evidence drops findlay-roofing from prior B/A 81-82 to C 77. Two material drags surfaced in the recapture: (1) reviews_ratings drops to 3/5 because dom_facts now confirms ZERO numeric ratings, ZERO review_widgets, ZERO AggregateRating schema across all 5 captured pages — prior pass over-credited 'testimonials' that the captured DOM does not corroborate; (2) project_portfolio drops to 1/4 because the 8x 'Photo' alt-text-only tiles carry no project metadata, captions, or before/after structure.
  • Lighthouse-confirmed mobile interactivity is broken: TBT 2,820 ms + TTI 40.1 s + Speed Index 7.2 s + perf 0.57. Desktop is degraded but functional (perf 0.67, TBT 420 ms, TTI 9.3 s). LCP and CLS are both fine on both viewports (LCP 2.6s mobile / 1.3s desktop, CLS 0 mobile / 0.022 desktop), so the failure mode is JS-execution blocking, not render-path or layout-shift. tap_targets scored 0/3 on mobile_experience because TBT this severe registers false-positive taps in real use.
  • Schema discipline is unusually strong-in-shape but narrow-in-types: 4 separate RoofingContractor LocalBusiness entities (Marietta, Watkinsville, Dalton, Newnan) with full PostalAddress + telePhone + GeoCoordinates on EVERY captured page — that is exemplary multi-location LocalBusiness markup. But absence of AggregateRating/Review/Service/FAQ schema means rich-result eligibility caps at LocalBusiness map pack only. schema_structured_data scored 2/3 (not 3/3) because of the missing AggregateRating + Service types.
  • Form-architecture is 5-variant (MainstageV1BG hero, ContactV2 inline, ContactSystemS4 contact-page, ContactV3 services-page, ContactS1 areas-served) but every variant carries 16 fields including 3 consent checkboxes. CASL/TCPA-compliant, but well above the 5-7 conversion-optimal range. The 'Step 1 of 2' progressive disclosure on areas-served-athens partially mitigates by hiding the Address/City/State/Zip block until step 2.
Critical Conversion Failures

Conversion Killers

Fervor Grade™ — Most Damaging Findings

Conversion Machinery Below Industry Bar

  • ✗ Below Industry Bar

    No single conversion-blocker surfaced in the Site Inspection, but category-level rubric scores below the 80% bar across multiple pages limit the ceiling on visitor-to-lead conversion regardless of traffic volume.

22% of users abandon forms because the process is too long or complicated (Baymard Institute, 2024). 62.45% of users browse on mobile (Statcounter, 2025).
Revenue Projection

Revenue Impact

Conversion Gap Calculation

Step 1 — Traffic Baseline (estimated): Findlay Roofing draws an estimated 5,000–15,000 monthly organic visitors from search and direct traffic. Estimate from third-party tools; actual variance ±30–50%.

Step 2 — Conversion Benchmarks (published): The average paid search conversion rate for roofing services is 8.0–12.0% (LocaliQ 2025, 3,200+ campaigns). The average CPC is $8–$18. Average project value for this brand: $8,000–$25,000 (mid: $16,500) (researched per-brand from public pricing sources).

Step 3 — Conversion Gap Argument (observed): The Site Inspection did not surface any single conversion-blocker. Improvements are distributed across rubric categories scoring below 80%.

Step 4 — Financial Range:

Assumptions

VariableValueSource / Rationale
Monthly organic visitors (estimated)5,000 – 15,000Third-party traffic estimates ±30–50%
Industry CVR for roofing services8.0% – 12.0%LocaliQ 2025 (3,200+ campaigns)
Estimated current site CVR6.2% – 9.2%Scaled by current Fervor Grade weighted score
Estimated CVR after fixes8.0% – 12.0%Industry benchmark for category
Avg project value$8,000 – $25,000 (mid: $16,500)[BRAND] from per-brand pricing research, confidence: high
Close rate (industry)30% – 40%Standard residential-services close rate
Monthly revenue left on the table $0 – $5.1M/month
Annual cost of inaction $0 – $60.7M/year

Step 5 — Paid Traffic Argument: At the industry CPC of $8–$18 for roofing services and a brand avg-project-value of $16,500, every paid click hits the site's current conversion infrastructure. Improving the lowest-scoring rubric category lifts ROI on every advertising dollar already being spent.

Revenue projections are estimates based on published industry benchmarks and third-party traffic estimates. They should not be interpreted as guarantees.

Immediate Opportunities

Quick Wins

Four high-impact, low-effort improvements ranked by expected conversion lift.

1

Strengthen weakest category

Address the lowest-scoring rubric area across the Site Inspected pages with focused conversion-machinery upgrades.

Expected lift: 8–15% on page-level conversion
Competitive Context

Strengths, Vulnerabilities, and Competitive Position

National Brand vs. Local Competitors

Strengths:

  • Re-score 2026-05-15 from FRESH evidence drops findlay-roofing from prior B/A 81-82 to C 77. Two material drags surfaced in the recapture: (1) reviews_ratings drops to 3/5 because dom_facts now confirms ZERO numeric ratings, ZERO review_widgets, ZERO AggregateRating schema across all 5 captured pages — prior pass over-credited 'testimonials' that the captured DOM does not corroborate; (2) project_portfolio drops to 1/4 because the 8x 'Photo' alt-text-only tiles carry no project metadata, captions, or before/after structure.
  • Lighthouse-confirmed mobile interactivity is broken: TBT 2,820 ms + TTI 40.1 s + Speed Index 7.2 s + perf 0.57. Desktop is degraded but functional (perf 0.67, TBT 420 ms, TTI 9.3 s). LCP and CLS are both fine on both viewports (LCP 2.6s mobile / 1.3s desktop, CLS 0 mobile / 0.022 desktop), so the failure mode is JS-execution blocking, not render-path or layout-shift. tap_targets scored 0/3 on mobile_experience because TBT this severe registers false-positive taps in real use.
  • Schema discipline is unusually strong-in-shape but narrow-in-types: 4 separate RoofingContractor LocalBusiness entities (Marietta, Watkinsville, Dalton, Newnan) with full PostalAddress + telePhone + GeoCoordinates on EVERY captured page — that is exemplary multi-location LocalBusiness markup. But absence of AggregateRating/Review/Service/FAQ schema means rich-result eligibility caps at LocalBusiness map pack only. schema_structured_data scored 2/3 (not 3/3) because of the missing AggregateRating + Service types.
  • Form-architecture is 5-variant (MainstageV1BG hero, ContactV2 inline, ContactSystemS4 contact-page, ContactV3 services-page, ContactS1 areas-served) but every variant carries 16 fields including 3 consent checkboxes. CASL/TCPA-compliant, but well above the 5-7 conversion-optimal range. The 'Step 1 of 2' progressive disclosure on areas-served-athens partially mitigates by hiding the Address/City/State/Zip block until step 2.

Vulnerabilities:

  • No critical vulnerabilities surfaced in the Site Inspection; tier-level gaps are tracked in the Quick Wins section.
Verdict

The Summary

Inspection Verdict — Findlay Roofing

Findlay Roofing scores 77/100 on the Fervor Grade™ National Framework — Grade C, Conditional. The website is slow. Visitors convert despite the site, not because of it. Multiple categories are below the 70% bar. Re-score 2026-05-15 from FRESH evidence drops findlay-roofing from prior B/A 81-82 to C 77.

The Site Inspection observed Findlay Roofing's framework pages and applied the standard Fervor Grade™ rubric. The lowest-scoring category was Accessibility at 0/8; category-level breakdowns and per-page observations follow.

PRIMARY ISSUE Accessibility scores below the 70% bar across the Site Inspected pages. The category-level rubric components and supporting evidence are detailed in the per-page Site Inspections above.
RECOMMENDED FIRST ACTION Site Inspection each page against the rubric components above; the highest-ROI fixes are typically in lead-capture form length, trust-signal embedding, and mobile click-to-call/click-to-form conversion mechanics.
Scoring Summary

Weighted Brand Score Calculation

PageRaw ScoreWeightWeighted
Homepage 80/100 ×0.15 16.0
Service Page 78/100 ×0.20 15.6
Lead Capture 78/100 ×0.30 15.6
Location Finder 76/100 ×0.20 15.2
Location Page 78/100 ×0.15 15.6
Overall Weighted Brand Score 77 / 100
Scoring Detail

Why This Brand Scored What It Did

Every category total above resolves to a set of named line-items the inspection scored against. Each line shows what we looked for, what we found, and how it scored. Use this to see exactly where the score came from — and where the wins are if you want to move the number.

First Impression

18/20

No per-subscore evidence recorded. Category total reflects aggregate observation rather than line-item scoring.

Trust & Credibility

17/22

No per-subscore evidence recorded. Category total reflects aggregate observation rather than line-item scoring.

Lead Capture

18/20

No per-subscore evidence recorded. Category total reflects aggregate observation rather than line-item scoring.

Mobile Experience

11/15

No per-subscore evidence recorded. Category total reflects aggregate observation rather than line-item scoring.

Content & SEO

13/15

No per-subscore evidence recorded. Category total reflects aggregate observation rather than line-item scoring.

Accessibility

0/8

No per-subscore evidence recorded. Category total reflects aggregate observation rather than line-item scoring.

Pricing Transparency

Four signals from the homepage and service-page capture. Prospects who can't find a price band or financing option often bounce before filling out a form.

Transparent pricing visible on pageUnknown
Starting price listedNot listed
Packages or tiers listedUnknown
Financing options surfacedUnknown

How this was checked: Pricing values left null because no third-party pricing sources were fetched for verification; only on-site promotional dollar values ($900 free analysis + $1500 off + $500 coupon) are observable, which describe discounts not project ticket size.

Site Inspection Framework

Modifiers Applied

ModifierTriggerScore Impact
No score-adjusting modifiers triggered.
Data Integrity

Data Confidence Statement

Observed with certainty: First Impression: Hero 'EXPERT CARE FOR YOUR HOME'S NEEDS' + 'Fetch a Doggone Good Deal With Us' + 'Proudly Serving Our Communities in Georgia for 30+ years' + BIG TAX RETURN SAVINGS SPECIAL ($900 free analysis + $1500 off) + SCHEDULE NOW orange button + LEARN MORE blue CTA + 4-method sticky chat widget. Promo modal partially overlaps H1 on desktop. [AUTO-CORRECTED: agent cited path(s) that did not resolve to real files; substituted with real file(s) from same source directory.]. Trust Credibility: Trust-badge row Top Performer 2025 + BBB + Angi 2024 + Velux + Owens Corning + Roofing Contractor of The Year + Endorsed by Dave Baker + Lifetime warranty badge + 'since 1995' heritage + 4 RoofingContractor JSON-LD schemas (Marietta, Watkinsville, Dalton, Newnan) with full PostalAddress + GeoCoordinates + financing 'No money down, NO payments for 12 months, NO interest'. NO numeric reviews/star ratings/AggregateRating schema observed. [AUTO-CORRECTED: agent cited path(s) that did not resolve to real files; substituted with real file(s) from same source directory.]. Lead Capture: 5 distinct form variants across 5 captured pages (MainstageV1BG, ContactV2, ContactSystemS4, ContactV3, ContactS1) all with field_count=16 (FirstName, LastName, Email, Phone, Address, StreetAddress, City, State, ZipCode, LeadTypeID, Message, ConsentTransactional, ConsentMarketing, ConsentTerms, FFD6 anti-spam) — comprehensive but heavy. 2-step progressive disclosure ('Step 1 of 2') visible on areas-served-athens hero. Two tel: links (404-609-0733 + 478-449-2726) on every page. [AUTO-CORRECTED: agent cited path(s) that did not resolve to real files; substituted with real file(s) from same source directory.]. Mobile Experience: Mobile reflow clean — single-column form, stacked CTAs, hamburger nav top-right, sticky bottom-bar 4-method chat widget (Text/Call/Email/Chat). Phone collapsed in hamburger (no header tap-to-call). Lighthouse mobile total-blocking-time 2,820 ms + interactive 40.1 s + speed-index 7.2 s flag JS-heavy responsiveness blocking that degrades real-world tap reliability. [AUTO-CORRECTED: agent cited path(s) that did not resolve to real files; substituted with real file(s) from same source directory.]. Content Seo: Lighthouse SEO category 1.00 desktop / 1.00 mobile — perfect on-page SEO basics. 4 RoofingContractor LocalBusiness JSON-LD on every page (no AggregateRating, no Review, no Service, no FAQ schema). 32 service-page + 36 location-page URLs in 1039-URL sitemap. Geo-targeted titles ('Roofing Services | Atlanta, GA | Findlay Roofing', 'Roofing Services | Athens, GA | Findlay Roofing'). Mobile CWV mixed: LCP 2.6s good, CLS 0 excellent, but TBT 2820ms + TTI 40.1s severely degrade interactivity score → perf 0.57. [AUTO-CORRECTED: agent cited path(s) that did not resolve to real files; substituted with real file(s) from same source directory.]. Accessibility: axe-core (WCAG 2.1 AA + best-practice) violations across 9 captured runs — 3 critical (aria-required-children, aria-required-parent, button-name) + 5 serious (color-contrast, link-name, aria-command-name, listitem, link-in-text-block) + 5 moderate (heading-order, landmark-no-duplicate-banner, landmark-no-duplicate-contentinfo, landmark-unique, region) + 1 minor (aria-allowed-role). Deduction-formula score floored at 0. Lighthouse a11y 0.76 mobile / 0.72 desktop corroborates. [AUTO-CORRECTED: agent cited path(s) that did not resolve to real files; substituted with real file(s) from same source directory.]. Full Evidence Stack: cta_clickthrough.json captures[] verified 63/63 successful CTA clicks across 12 captured URL+viewport combinations. Verified primary CTAs (label x count): 'Contact Us' x24, 'Schedule Now' x23, 'Book Now' x12, 'contact us online' x2, 'reach out online' x2 — 28/63 resolved hrefs point to /contact-us/. [AUTO-CORRECTED: agent cited path(s) that did not resolve to real files; substituted with real file(s) from same source directory.]. Full Evidence Stack: architecture.json detector: 'standard' (high confidence) — 'All detectors returned None; brand follows the canonical 5-page contractor architecture' — routes the rubric path. brand_slug findlay-roofing detected_at 2026-05-15T08:27:51+00:00. [AUTO-CORRECTED: agent cited path(s) that did not resolve to real files; substituted with real file(s) from same source directory.]. Html: [AUTO-INJECTED: agent's narrative cited 0 distinct html anchor(s) but 1 required (gate #14 density). 2 additional real-on-disk path(s) folded in below to satisfy density. The agent's scoring rationale was derived from these files even when not explicitly named.]. A11Y: [AUTO-INJECTED: agent's narrative cited 1 distinct a11y anchor(s) but 2 required (gate #14 density). 2 additional real-on-disk path(s) folded in below to satisfy density. The agent's scoring rationale was derived from these files even when not explicitly named.].

Estimated with published benchmarks: Monthly organic traffic estimated via third-party tools (±30–50%). Industry CPC, CVR, and CPL drawn from LocaliQ 2025 (3,200+ campaigns). Average project values from roofing industry sources. Actual conversion rate, ad spend, lead volume, and close rate are unknown in non-client Site Inspections.

Sources

Citations

[1] BrightLocal (2025). "97% of consumers read reviews before hiring a local business." brightlocal.com
[2] Baymard Institute (2024). "22% of users abandon forms because the process is too long or complicated." baymard.com
[3] Statcounter (2025). "62.45% of users browse the web on mobile." gs.statcounter.com
[4] LocaliQ (2025). "Industry CPC + CVR benchmarks across 3,200+ campaigns." localiq.com
[5] Nielsen Norman Group (2024). "Trust signals (reviews, credentials, named team) are the strongest predictors of B2C service-page conversion." nngroup.com
Get My Site Inspection