Skip to main content
Fervor Grade™  /  The CRO Index  /  Fervor Grade™ 2.5
National Site Inspection — Foundation Repair — Canada & United States

Groundworks

A conversion audit of the highest-traffic organic pages across groundworks.com — measuring whether the website earns trust independent of brand equity.

Domain groundworks.com
Audit Date March 19, 2026
Pages Audited 5
77 /100 Weighted Score: B Grade / Passing
Executive Summary

Fervor Grade™ — Groundworks

Foundation Repair (also Basement Waterproofing, Crawl Space, Concrete Lifting) · National brand, 45+ offices across 33 states, direct-hire (subsidiary brands: JES, Mount Valley, etc.)

Overall Weighted Brand Score 77
Fervor Grade™ Interpretation

77/100 · Grade B — Passing. The website earns trust on its own. Conversion infrastructure is functional across most categories — visitors get enough signals to act without relying on brand recognition alone.

Homepage 78 Location Finder 72 Location Page 82 Service Page 74 Lead Capture 72
Homepage 78 ×0.15 · wt. 11.7
Location Finder 72 ×0.20 · wt. 14.4
Location Page 82 ×0.30 · wt. 24.6
Service Page 74 ×0.20 · wt. 14.8
Lead Capture 72 ×0.15 · wt. 10.8

Methodology note. This audit applies the Fervor Grade™ 2.0 National Framework scoring rubric to the 5 highest-traffic pages on groundworks.com. Each page is scored across 6 categories (First Impression /20, Trust & Credibility /22, Lead Capture /20, Mobile Experience /15, Content & SEO /15, Accessibility /8 = 100 points per page). Pages weighted by conversion importance: Location Page 30%, Location Finder 20%, Service Page 20%, Homepage 15%, Lead Capture 15%. Fervor Grade™ scores conversion infrastructure independent of brand equity. A national brand with weak conversion signals still converts because brand trust is carried into the visit before the website loads. This audit measures whether the website earns trust — not whether the brand already has it.

Page 1 of 5 — Homepage

Homepage

Homepage
groundworks.com
78 /100 Green Band
First Impression
16/20
Trust & Credibility
17/22
Lead Capture
16/20
Mobile Experience
13/15
Content & SEO
10/15
Accessibility
6/8
Page Total
78/100
✓ Pass — First Impression

"Foundation Solutions Crafted with Pride" — professional but doesn't mention free inspection. Subtext clearly lists all 4 services. Postal code + "Schedule a free Inspection" CTA above fold — strong. Phone number visible in header (719-347-4246). Clean design, professional photography. Residential/Commercial toggle at top.

✓ Pass — Trust & Credibility

Google and Yelp reviews carousel with named reviewers and "View Review" links to source platforms (4/5). "Trained Certified" badge banner (3/4). No credentials section (BBB badge not on homepage). Professional crew photography throughout. No about/team section on homepage (0/2).

✓ Pass — Lead Capture

Postal code + "Schedule a free Inspection" above fold — excellent (5/5). Form is on-page (not separate page). CTA text is benefit-driven. Phone + form + zip code search = multi-channel (4/5). No chat widget observed.

✓ Pass — Mobile Experience

Phone number in header — click-to-call ready. Responsive layout. CWV fails on mobile (LCP 3.5s, TTFB 2.4s) — significant penalty (1/3 for speed). Touch targets adequate.

⚠ Warn — Content & SEO

Title: "Groundworks

✓ Pass — Accessibility

Clean typography, adequate contrast (dark navy on white). Professional imagery. Body text 16px+.

✓ Pass

Postal code + CTA above fold is the fastest conversion path possible — one field

✓ Pass

Reviews carousel with named reviewers and platform verification (Google, Yelp icons)

✓ Pass

"Trained Certified" credential banner

✓ Pass

Professional action photography (crew installing piers, consulting with homeowners)

✓ Pass

Residential/Commercial toggle shows dual-market capability

✓ Pass

Phone number prominent in header

✗ Issue

Hero headline "Foundation Solutions Crafted with Pride" doesn't mention free inspection

✗ Issue

No BBB A+ badge on homepage despite having the rating

✗ Issue

No aggregate review count/rating summary (just individual review cards)

✗ Issue

CWV failing on mobile — 3.5s LCP hurts mobile conversions

✗ Issue

No chat widget for real-time engagement

Page 2 of 5 — Location Finder

Location Finder

Location Finder
groundworks.com/locations/
72 /100 Green Band
First Impression
15/20
Trust & Credibility
12/22
Lead Capture
14/20
Mobile Experience
12/15
Content & SEO
13/15
Accessibility
6/8
Page Total
72/100
✓ Pass — First Impression

"Search for your local Groundworks location" — clear and functional. ZIP code search above fold with "Search" button. Professional family/home imagery. Phone number in header. Clean layout.

⚠ Warn — Trust & Credibility

No reviews or ratings on the location finder page itself (0/5). No credentials displayed. State-by-state accordion listing is functional but has no trust signals embedded. No team photos.

✓ Pass — Lead Capture

ZIP code search IS the lead capture mechanism — enters the scheduling funnel (4/5). Phone number visible. "Free Estimate" button in header. No form on this page directly — the ZIP search routes to location-specific pages or the scheduling flow.

✓ Pass — Mobile Experience

ZIP code search works well on mobile. State accordions are touch-friendly. Phone number click-to-call in header. CWV concerns carry from shared origin.

✓ Pass — Content & SEO

Title: "Companies - Groundworks" — should be "Find a Groundworks Location Near You." Dual discovery (ZIP search + state browsing). Comprehensive state coverage (33+ states). Each state expands to show local branches. Internal links to individual location pages.

✓ Pass — Accessibility

Clean contrast. Accordion pattern is standard accessible component. State abbreviation badges are decorative.

✓ Pass

Dual discovery method: ZIP code search + state-by-state browsing

✓ Pass

ZIP search immediately enters the conversion funnel

✓ Pass

Comprehensive national coverage (33+ states, 45+ offices)

✓ Pass

Clean, uncluttered design

✓ Pass

Phone number accessible in header

✗ Issue

Title tag "Companies - Groundworks" is poor — should include location-finding intent

✗ Issue

No map visualization — a national company with 45+ locations should show a map

✗ Issue

No trust signals on the location finder page (no aggregate ratings, no BBB badge)

✗ Issue

No "nearby locations" based on geolocation detection

✗ Issue

State accordions are text-only — no preview of ratings or review counts per branch

Page 3 of 5 — Location Page — Denver, CO

Location Page — Denver, CO

Location Page — Denver, CO
groundworks.com/service-areas/foundation-repair-denver-co/
82 /100 Green Band
First Impression
18/20
Trust & Credibility
19/22
Lead Capture
15/20
Mobile Experience
12/15
Content & SEO
12/15
Accessibility
6/8
Page Total
82/100
✓ Pass — First Impression

"Foundation Repair in Denver, CO" — clear, location-specific headline. Google 4.7 stars (2,344 reviews) displayed immediately. "20,368 foundations repaired by the Denver branch" — powerful localized stat. "Schedule Inspection" CTA above fold. Phone number in header. Professional crew photography.

✓ Pass — Trust & Credibility

Google 4.7 stars with 2,344 reviews prominently displayed (5/5). "2,092 five star reviews" and "1,817 neighbors recommend" stats (4/4). "Certified and local" crews (3/4). "Nationally backed warranty" (3/3). "See All Reviews" link. No BBB badge on this page (1/2).

✓ Pass — Lead Capture

"Schedule Inspection" CTA in hero. Mid-page postal code + "Schedule Inspection" CTA bar. Phone number visible. Multiple CTA placements throughout page. No form directly on page — routes to /contact-us/ wizard.

✓ Pass — Mobile Experience

Phone click-to-call in header. Responsive layout. Content sections stack well. CWV concerns apply. Touch targets adequate.

✓ Pass — Content & SEO

Title: "Foundation Repair in Denver, CO" — perfectly optimized. Localized content about Denver's clay soil, freeze-thaw cycles. "Types of Foundation Damage in Denver" with imagery. "Foundation Repair Solutions We Provide For You in Denver" with product photos (Wall Anchors, Wall Straps, I-Beams, Push Piers, Helical Piers). "Our Other Services in Denver" cross-links. "Proudly Serving Denver and Surrounding Areas" with 20+ cities. FAQ section. Internal linking to solution pages.

✓ Pass — Accessibility

Good contrast. Structured headings. FAQ accordion pattern. Professional imagery with descriptive context.

✓ Pass

Google 4.7 stars with 2,344 reviews displayed immediately — best-in-class trust signal

✓ Pass

"20,368 foundations repaired" localized stat — quantified credibility

✓ Pass

Denver-specific content about clay soil and freeze-thaw cycles — genuine local expertise

✓ Pass

Product-specific solutions with imagery (Wall Anchors, Push Piers, Helical Piers)

✓ Pass

FAQ section addresses common Denver homeowner questions

✓ Pass

Cross-service links (Basement Repair, Waterproofing, Concrete Lifting)

✓ Pass

"Proudly Serving" section with 20+ surrounding cities

✗ Issue

No form directly on the location page — all conversions route to /contact-us/

✗ Issue

No BBB badge despite A+ rating

✗ Issue

No before/after project photos specific to Denver

✗ Issue

No named local team members or inspector profiles

✗ Issue

Page could benefit from a pricing range or "what to expect" section

Page 4 of 5 — Primary Service Page — Foundation Repair

Primary Service Page — Foundation Repair

Primary Service Page — Foundation Repair
groundworks.com/solutions/foundation-repair/
74 /100 Green Band
First Impression
15/20
Trust & Credibility
14/22
Lead Capture
16/20
Mobile Experience
12/15
Content & SEO
12/15
Accessibility
5/8
Page Total
74/100
✓ Pass — First Impression

"Foundation Repair Solutions for Your Home" — clear headline. Breadcrumbs (Home / Solutions / Foundation Repair). Postal code + "Get Your Free Estimate" yellow CTA button above fold. Phone number in header. No hero imagery — text-only hero section with single-color background.

⚠ Warn — Trust & Credibility

No reviews or ratings on the service page (0/5). "Nationally backed warranties" callout mid-page (3/4). "Trained Certified" mentioned. No credentials section. No testimonials. Professional crew photography in content sections. "Below with Rowe" branded video content (2/2 for portfolio/proof).

✓ Pass — Lead Capture

Postal code + "Get Your Free Estimate" above fold (5/5). Mid-page CTA: "Do you see any of these signs? Book an appointment now!" with "Get Your Free Estimate" button. Bottom CTA: "Do not wait until it's too late." Multiple conversion points throughout page. Phone in header.

✓ Pass — Mobile Experience

Responsive. CTA buttons prominent. Phone click-to-call. Content sections readable. CWV concerns.

✓ Pass — Content & SEO

Title: "Foundation Repair

⚠ Warn — Accessibility

Adequate contrast. Card-based layout with clear headings. Video content may lack captions (not verified).

✓ Pass

Multiple CTA placements — hero, mid-page, and bottom (3 conversion opportunities)

✓ Pass

Problem symptom cards educate homeowners on warning signs — builds urgency

✓ Pass

"Causes of Foundation Problems" section with expandable detail cards

✓ Pass

Branded video content ("Below with Rowe") — unique content asset

✓ Pass

Internal linking to related services and deeper content

✓ Pass

Breadcrumb navigation aids both UX and SEO

✗ Issue

No reviews or testimonials on the service page — missed trust opportunity

✗ Issue

Hero section is text-only with no imagery — less visually engaging than location pages

✗ Issue

No pricing guidance or "what to expect" cost section

✗ Issue

No FAQ on the service page (though location pages have them)

✗ Issue

No case studies or before/after transformations

Page 5 of 5 — Lead Capture / Contact Us

Lead Capture / Contact Us

Lead Capture / Contact Us
groundworks.com/contact-us/
72 /100 Green Band
First Impression
14/20
Trust & Credibility
16/22
Lead Capture
18/20
Mobile Experience
10/15
Content & SEO
8/15
Accessibility
6/8
Page Total
72/100
✓ Pass — First Impression

"Book Your Appointment Today!" — clear, action-oriented headline. BBB A+ badge (As of 3/10/2026) displayed adjacent to headline — strong trust signal at point of conversion. 4-step progress indicator (Services → Date & Time → Contact Info → Complete) visible. Phone number in header.

✓ Pass — Trust & Credibility

BBB A+ badge prominently displayed next to headline (4/4 for credentials). No reviews on this page. No testimonials adjacent to form. No guarantee statement. Progress indicator builds confidence in process.

✓ Pass — Lead Capture

4-step progressive disclosure wizard — industry-leading form design (5/5 for form presence). Step 1: Service dropdown + postal code (2 fields). Step 2: Date selection + time selection. Step 3: First Name, Last Name, Email, Phone, Address, Comments (6 fields). Phone auto-formats — polished UX (5/5 for field count across steps). "Schedule Your Free Inspection" — benefit-driven heading (4/5). Phone + form + "In a rush? Call us" at every step = multi-channel (5/5). SMS/TCPA consent properly implemented.

⚠ Warn — Mobile Experience

Multi-step form works on mobile. Progress indicator visible. Phone numbers tappable. CWV failing impacts mobile experience. Fields stack vertically.

⚠ Warn — Content & SEO

Title: "Contact Your Trusted Foundation Repair Experts" — optimized. Breadcrumbs present. Minimal page content beyond the form. No FAQ. No trust-building content around the form (beyond BBB badge).

✓ Pass — Accessibility

Form labels clear. Adequate contrast. Progress indicator provides context. Button sizing adequate.

✓ Pass

4-step progressive disclosure form — industry-leading UX design

✓ Pass

BBB A+ badge adjacent to headline — trust at point of conversion

✓ Pass

Real scheduling availability (actual dates/times, not generic "we'll contact you")

✓ Pass

Phone number + "In a rush? Call us." at every step — excellent escape hatch

✓ Pass

Phone auto-formatting

✓ Pass

Google Places autocomplete for address — reduces typing

✓ Pass

SMS consent is opt-in (not pre-checked) — compliant and honest

✗ Issue

"Submit" button could be "Confirm Your Free Inspection" — more specific

✗ Issue

No reviews or testimonials adjacent to form

✗ Issue

No "what happens next" expectation setting

✗ Issue

Address field could be optional (postal code already captured in Step 1)

✗ Issue

Only 2 time slots shown for selected date — may feel limiting

✗ Issue

No guarantee or warranty messaging on the form page

Single Most Damaging Finding

The Conversion Killer

Fervor Grade™ — Single Most Damaging Finding

Groundworks is the nation's largest foundation repair company, and their website largely reflects that scale. The Denver location page is among the best in this audit batch — localized content about Denver's clay soil, 20,368 foundations repaired stat, Google 4.7 stars displayed prominently, FAQ section, and service-specific solutions with product imagery. The 4-step lead capture form wizard (Services → Date & Time → Contact Info → Complete) is the most sophisticated form UX in this batch, using progressive disclosure to reduce perceived friction while collecting everything needed to schedule a real inspection.

The critical gap is infrastructure: Core Web Vitals fail on mobile with a TTFB of 2.4 seconds — 3x the threshold. For a company running ~8,000 Google Ads, every paid click hits a slow page. Sites loading in 1 second achieve approximately 39% conversion rate (Portent/Cloudflare, 2023). At Groundworks' scale, even fractional conversion improvements translate to thousands of additional monthly leads. The TTFB fix is the single highest-ROI improvement available — it would improve LCP, FCP, Quality Score (reducing CPC), and organic rankings simultaneously. The secondary gap is organic visibility: despite having arguably the best Denver location page in the market, Groundworks doesn't rank in the top 10 for "foundation repair Denver CO." The CWV failure likely contributes to this, making the performance fix doubly valuable.

Primary Issue: Failing Core Web Vitals (TTFB 2.4s, LCP 3.5s) undermine an otherwise strong conversion infrastructure — the site earns trust but loads too slowly to capture it.

Recommendation: Fix TTFB first (edge caching / CDN — 1–2 week infrastructure project), then add embedded forms to location and service pages to eliminate the routing friction to /contact-us/.

Revenue Projection

Revenue Impact

Conversion Gap Calculation

Step 1 — Traffic Baseline (estimated): Groundworks is the nation's largest foundation repair company with 45+ offices across 33 states and ~8,000 active Google Ads. Based on this scale, estimated monthly organic traffic for groundworks.com: 200,000–500,000 visitors. This is a third-party estimate. Actual traffic may vary ±30–50%.

Step 2 — Conversion Benchmarks (published): The average paid search conversion rate for foundation repair is 5.0–7.0% (LocaliQ 2025, 3,200+ campaigns). The average CPC is $8.00–$12.00. Average project value: $5,000–$15,000.

Step 3 — Conversion Gap Argument (observed): This site has moderate conversion infrastructure gaps: - Core Web Vitals failing on mobile (LCP 3.5s, TTFB 2.4s) — ~12% conversion drop per additional second of load time - No form on location pages — all conversions route through /contact-us/ - Address field required in form Step 3 (postal code already captured in Step 1) - No reviews on service page - Not ranking organically for "foundation repair Denver" despite excellent location page - Homepage hero doesn't mention "free inspection" — the primary value proposition

Strengths offsetting gaps: - Multi-step progressive form is industry-leading - Reviews displayed prominently on homepage and location pages - BBB A+ badge on contact page - "Schedule a free Inspection" CTA on homepage

Step 4 — Financial Range:

Assumptions

VariableValueSource / Rationale
Monthly organic visitors (est.) 350,000 (midpoint estimate)
Industry CVR for foundation repair 5.0% – 7.0% (LocaliQ 2025)
Estimated current CVR (CWV + gaps) 3.0% – 4.5%
Estimated improved CVR (addressing gaps) 5.0% – 6.5%
Additional leads per month 7,000 – 7,000+
Close rate (industry benchmark) 25% – 35%
Avg project value $7,500 (midpoint)
Monthly revenue left on the table $13.1M – $18.4M+
Annual cost of inaction $157M – $220M+

Note: These ranges reflect Groundworks' national scale. Even a 1% CVR improvement across 350K monthly visitors generates thousands of additional leads. The CWV fix alone could recover a significant portion.

Step 5 — Paid Traffic Argument: Groundworks is running ~8,000 active Google Ads across multiple subsidiary accounts. At the industry average CPC of $8.00–$12.00 for foundation repair, this suggests monthly ad spend of $200K–$500K+. Every paid click hits a site with failing Core Web Vitals (LCP 3.5s). Fixing TTFB and LCP would improve Quality Score (Google uses page experience signals), potentially reducing CPC while increasing conversion rate — a double benefit. The multi-step form is already strong; the performance fix is where the multiplier lives.

⚠ These revenue figures are our projections based on third-party traffic estimates and industry benchmark conversion rates. Actual results depend on implementation quality, seasonal demand, market coverage, and sales team close rates. These figures represent accessible opportunity from existing traffic — not guaranteed outcomes.

Competitive Context

Strengths, Vulnerabilities, and Competitive Position

National Brand vs. Local Competitors (Denver Market)

Strengths:

  • Largest foundation repair company in the US (45+ offices, 33 states, 1.5M+ homeowners served)
  • Google 4.8 stars (4,876 reviews in Denver) — review volume dwarfs local competitors
  • Industry-leading multi-step lead capture form — best form UX in this audit batch
  • Comprehensive localized content on Denver location page (clay soil, freeze-thaw, 20K+ foundations repaired)
  • BBB A+ rating with 101 locations listed
  • ~8,000 active Google Ads — massive paid search presence
  • "Nationally backed warranty" — competitive differentiator against local operators
  • "Trained Certified" program — standardized quality assurance
  • Residential + Commercial dual-market capability
  • Product-specific solutions with professional imagery (Push Piers, Helical Piers, Wall Anchors)
Vulnerabilities:
  • Core Web Vitals failing (LCP 3.5s, TTFB 2.4s) — Google uses this for ranking
  • Not ranking top 10 organically for "foundation repair Denver CO" — local competitors outrank
  • Glassdoor 2.9/5 employee rating (37% recommend) — potential brand risk if discovered
  • Location finder title tag "Companies" is poorly optimized
  • No form on location or service pages — all conversions route through /contact-us/
  • Homepage hero doesn't mention free inspection — the primary conversion offer
  • Some BBB complaints about overpricing (e.g., $40K quote vs. $4K actual cost from competitor)
  • No interactive map on locations page despite national footprint

Verdict

The Summary

Inspection Verdict — Groundworks

Groundworks scores 77/100 on the Fervor Grade™ National Framework — Grade B, Passing. The website earns trust on its own. Conversion signals are functional across most categories. A local competitor would need to match this standard to win side-by-side comparisons.

PRIMARY ISSUE The critical gap is infrastructure: Core Web Vitals fail on mobile with a TTFB of 2.4 seconds — 3x the threshold. For a company running ~8,000 Google Ads, every paid click hits a slow page. Sites loading in 1 second achieve approximately 39% conversion rate (Portent/Cloudflare, 2023). At Groundworks' scale, even fractional conversion improvements translate to thousands of additional monthly leads. The TTFB fix is the single highest-ROI improvement available — it would improve LCP, FCP, Quality Score (reducing CPC), and organic rankings simultaneously. The secondary gap is organic visibility: despite having arguably the best Denver location page in the market, Groundworks doesn't rank in the top 10 for "foundation repair Denver CO." The CWV failure likely contributes to this, making the performance fix doubly valuable.
RECOMMENDED FIRST ACTION Groundworks' homepage fails Core Web Vitals on mobile with a Time to First Byte of 2.4 seconds (threshold: 0.8s) and Largest Contentful Paint of 3.5 seconds (threshold: 2.5s). For a company running ~8,000 Google Ads, every paid click hits a slow-loading page. Sites loading in 1 second achieve approximately 39% conversion rate; that drops to 0.6% at 5.7 seconds (Portent/Cloudflare, 2023). With 62.45% of all web traffic originating from mobile devices (Statcounter, 2025), the performance gap is costing Groundworks conversions on every mobile visit.
Scoring Summary

Weighted Brand Score Calculation

PageRaw ScoreWeightWeighted
Homepage 78/100 ×0.15 11.70
Location Finder 72/100 ×0.20 14.40
Location Page 82/100 ×0.30 24.60
Service Page 74/100 ×0.20 14.80
Lead Capture 72/100 ×0.15 10.80
Overall Weighted Brand Score 77 / 100
Audit Framework

Modifiers Applied

Modifier IDNameTriggerScore Impact
M-EL-08Inspection-First CTAFoundation repair requires on-site inspection before quote"Schedule a Free Inspection" scored as benefit-driven CTA

Raw Score (v2.0, no modifiers): 76/100

Modified Score (v2.5): 77/100

Net Modifier Impact: +1 points (within +12 cap)

Data Integrity

Data Confidence Statement

Observed with certainty: All 5 pages navigated and screenshotted (desktop). Core Web Vitals verified via PageSpeed Insights (CrUX field data — mobile): LCP 3.5s ⚠️, INP 127ms ✅, CLS 0 ✅, FCP 3.5s ❌, TTFB 2.4s ❌ — CWV Assessment: Failed. Google Ads Transparency checked (~8K active ads across multiple advertiser accounts including JES Construction LLC). Phone number confirmed in header (719-347-4246 for Colorado market). Multi-step lead capture form walked through 99% — 4-step wizard documented (Services → Date & Time → Contact Info → Complete). Reviews verified across BBB (A+, 4.55 stars), Google (4.8 stars Denver, 4,876 reviews), Yelp (200 reviews Denver), This Old House (4.5/5). Denver location page confirmed with localized content, Google 4.7-star rating display, and 20,368 foundations repaired stat.

Estimated with published benchmarks: Monthly organic traffic (third-party estimate, ±30–50%), industry CPC/CVR/CPL from LocaliQ 2025 (3,200+ campaigns), average project values from industry data. Actual conversion rate, ad spend, lead volume, and close rate are unknown in non-client audits.